Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/1052/2010 • CJ GE ATAS/1052/2010 Generato dall'IA

Appellant Withdrawal of Appeal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1052/2010
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant filed an appeal against a decision from the cantonal compensation fund concerning a matter related to that entity. During the subsequent hearing, the appellant formally withdrew its appeal, leading the court to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appellant Withdrawal of Appeal: During the subsequent hearing, the appellant formally withdrew its appeal, leading the court to acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria decisione incidentale impugnabile fondo di compensazione diritto di togliere le addizioni oggetto della lite procedura di ricusazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the imposition of costs, which is implicitly applied when handling the withdrawal of the appeal, although the specific decision on costs is not explicitly ordered here, the general procedure suggests its relevance if costs were due; however, since no explicit citation is made in the dispositive regarding costs, and the dispositive only contains orders 1 and 2, we must adhere strictly to cited provisions.
Generato dall'IA
A/1309/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision
A/2967/2009
Appellant Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Compensation Fund Decision
A/3572/2018
Appeal Withdrawn and Case Struck from Roll
A/3407/2016
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Striking
A/2729/2019
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Dismissal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the imposition of costs, which is implicitly applied when handling the withdrawal of the appeal, although the specific decision on costs is not explicitly ordered here, the general procedure suggests its relevance if costs were due; however, since no explicit citation is made in the dispositive regarding costs, and the dispositive only contains orders 1 and 2, we must adhere strictly to cited provisions.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

REPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENEVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4327/2009 ATAS/1052/2010

ARRET

DU TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES

Chambre 3 du 14 octobre 2010 En la cause

X__________, à Genève recourante

contre

CAISSE CANTONALE GENEVOISE DE COMPENSATION, intimée Direction, route de Chêne 54, case postale 6330, 1211 Genève 6

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente; Claudiane CORTHAY et Evelyne BOUCHAARA, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision sur opposition rendue par la CAISSE CANTONALE GENEVOISE DE COMPENSATION en date du 5 novembre 2009, concernant la société X__________

Vu le recours interjeté par celle-ci le 2 décembre 2009;

Vu la réponse de l'intimée du 5 janvier 2010;

Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 14 octobre 2010;

Attendu qu'à cette dernière audience la société a indiqué, qu'elle retirait son recours;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LE TRIBUNAL CANTONAL DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La Présidente :

Yaël BENZ Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/4327/2009