Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/105/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/105/2016 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal and Striking Case from Roll

Numero d'incarto ATAS/105/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The applicant appealed a decision from the cantonal disability insurance office dated October 29, 2015, but subsequently informed the court in writing on January 22, 2016, that they were withdrawing their appeal. The court consequently took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from the court roll, concluding the proceedings based on the applicant's explicit request to discontinue the action.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF; Withdrawal of Appeal and Striking Case from Roll: The court consequently took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from the court roll, concluding the proceedings based on the applicant's explicit request to discontinue the action.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
desistenza dall'azione assicurazione per invalidità soppressione di prestazioni d'invalidità licenziamento amministrativo deroga al diritto procedura di ricusazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF
This provision likely justifies the procedural step of striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal, although the specific rule for striking/withdrawal isn't explicitly named in the dispositive, the general procedure for final disposition of withdrawn cases often falls under such procedural articles in related jurisdictions when costs/fees are not mentioned. (Note: Since the decision explicitly takes note of the withdrawal and strikes the case, but cites no further provisions, and standard rules for costs (Art. 66 LTF) are not mentioned, the output remains minimal based strictly on the text provided.)
Generato dall'IA
A/4376/2020
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Striking
A/3359/2015
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Disability Insurance Office Decision
A/730/2024
Appeal Withdrawal and Case Striking
A/3811/2022
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Cantonal Disability Insurance Office Decision
A/3469/2011
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Disability Insurance Decision

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 108 al. 1 let. a LTF

This provision likely justifies the procedural step of striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal, although the specific rule for striking/withdrawal isn't explicitly named in the dispositive, the general procedure for final disposition of withdrawn cases often falls under such procedural articles in related jurisdictions when costs/fees are not mentioned. (Note: Since the decision explicitly takes note of the withdrawal and strikes the case, but cites no further provisions, and standard rules for costs (Art. 66 LTF) are not mentioned, the output remains minimal based strictly on the text provided.)

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

RÉPUBLIQUE ET CANTON DE GENÈVE

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4567/2015 ATAS/105/2016

COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 4 février 2016 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à THÔNEX, représentée par le syndicat SIT recourante

contre

OFFICE DE L'ASSURANCE-INVALIDITÉ DU CANTON DE GENÈVE, sis, rue des Gares 12, GENÈVE intimé

Siégeant : Karine STECK, Présidente; Michael BIOT et Claudiane CORTHAY, Juges assesseurs

- 2/2 -

Vu la décision de l’office cantonal de l’assurance-invalidité du 29 octobre 2015 concernant Madame A______ ; Vu le recours interjeté par cette dernière le 25 novembre 2015 ; Vu le délai accordé à la recourante pour motiver son recours ; Attendu que par écriture du 22 janvier 2016, celle-ci a indiqué le retirer ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS, LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière La présidente

Marie-Catherine SÉCHAUD Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le

A/4567/2015