Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/1045/2016 • CJ GE ATAS/1045/2016 Generato dall'IA

Appellant Withdraws Invalidity Insurance Appeal

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1045/2016
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellant, facing a decision on opposition from December 17, 2015, concerning an invalidity insurance matter against the cantonal disability insurance office, withdrew the appeal during the personal appearance hearing on December 5, 2016, after indicating they understood the situation. Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from the roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appellant Withdraws Invalidity Insurance Appeal: Consequently, the Social Insurance Chamber took note of the withdrawal and struck the case from the roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione invalidità revoca dell'opposizione contenzioso dell'assicurazione invalidità soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione vertenza di assicurazione sociale riesame da parte dell'assicuratore

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the imposition of court costs, which is implied by the procedural outcome of the case (even if not explicitly detailed for costs, this is the standard provision for cost allocation/adjudication in such procedural contexts).
Generato dall'IA
A/2503/2014
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case
A/823/2008
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
A/729/2024
Claimant Withdraws Appeal of Invalidity Insurance Decision
A/606/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
A/3214/2010
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the imposition of court costs, which is implied by the procedural outcome of the case (even if not explicitly detailed for costs, this is the standard provision for cost allocation/adjudication in such procedural contexts).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/4585/2015

### [ATAS/1045/2016](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/1972633) du 12.12.2016 ( AI ) , RETIRE [![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file/2016/0010/ATAS_001045_2016_A_4585_2015.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/4585/2015 ATAS/1045/2016 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 12 décembre 2016 9ème Chambre

En la cause

Monsieur A______, domicilié au LIGNON · recourant

contre

OFFICE DE L’ASSURANCE-INVALIDITE DU CANTON DE GENEVE, sis rue des Gares 12, GENEVE · intimé Vu la décision sur opposition du 17 décembre 2015 ; Vu le recours du 22 décembre 2015 ; Vu la réponse du 17 mars 2016 ; Vu l'audience de comparution personnelle des parties du 5 décembre 2016 ; Attendu qu'à cette dernière audience, le recourant a indiqué avoir compris la situation et qu'il retirait son recours ; Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.![endif]>![if>

2. Raye la cause du rôle.![endif]>![if>

La greffière Irene PONCET · La présidente Catherine TAPPONNIER Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le