Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/104/2008 • CJ GE ATAS/104/2008 Generato dall'IA

Issue Preclusion in Benefit Entitlement Based on Prior Administrative Finding of Missed Condition Precedent

Numero d'incarto ATAS/104/2008
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned whether a prior administrative determination regarding a party's entitlement to benefits was binding on a subsequent court action concerning the same entitlement, where the prior determination was based on a finding that the party failed to meet a time-sensitive condition precedent. The court reasoned that the prior administrative finding, having been rendered by an agency with jurisdiction and involving the same essential facts and issue of timeliness as the present litigation, represented a final decision on a jurisdictional prerequisite and thus precluded relitigation under principles of issue preclusion, affirming the lower court's dismissal of the subsequent claim.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 93 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Issue Preclusion in Benefit Entitlement Based on Prior Administrative Finding of Missed Condition Precedent: The court reasoned that the prior administrative finding, having been rendered by an agency with jurisdiction and involving the same essential facts and issue of timeliness as the present litigation, represented a final decision on a jurisdictional prerequisite and thus precluded relitigation under principles of issue preclusion, affirming the lower court's dismissal of the subsequent claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
condizione del diritto alla prestazione assicurativa licenziamento amministrativo determinazione della competenza applicabilità del diritto di prelazione preclusione per tardività effetti delle pronunce pregiudiziali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 93 LTF

Used to dismiss the appeal because it challenges a preliminary decision.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

Imposes the costs of the federal appeal proceedings on the appellant.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo



           &'()*&+))( ,&-)'&+)).

,

 ,/ ,     /

01"  - % +* 2 +)).            !"#"$$$$$$$$$%&' ""  (  )     "    )) # )       &' # # ) # *#  +,,, -./0* "%12! 132,1,, ,1

       !   "  ! #  $% % 

   *148*  

%  3 4%!""""%15-&9"1665%"' "9%'     !"#"$$$$$$$$$  ':""""; ,"-&9"1665"  "<== '!"9"%"'- ">  9"1665 - ""!!"  +,,?,5:@

 A '"'  B  C  """ ! %A %' "% !"  ))  # )         #   # )   # *#  +,,,D*!"0E11 9"1665"'&  !& %  !" " )* % "9 %A =&  %A"*& " 'F%   % '"G &" "H" =I

A- 'C%' "&"="&' "9%'FAA- "% %'"!! @

86-&9"1665 "9%'&!" %',5%'&9"1665 C A '"' = FA %F  & = !" F   %  """  "  %'%@

AA !&= '@

     4% ="&'&  C A" . >3  . ,  .  J. 1 %   /- " A"/  B%" DE  "9   % "  K     F %     !"'- C L" . >3 %   ='%'" "  !"  /''" % %"  % "  % 3  9" 1666 D EF " -C='%'""L"*- "-- %16 %'&9",723D )E@

&!' !"B/"%%L!0 ' 9@

A" 36 !"'FI , ""% G "%'!'% " B"-  = %%' B C"". " .8?C2, !!9!"/. D =.'/&  ""%A )"  (1615E@

=" %  "FA!"%%%'"!! @

A""" %0"!"'& "'@

"""%15-&9"1665- !! - % "& "C &&9B %&!' @





4256741665  *848*     5,/6  ,/ ,     /

%

  3 1

,. '"""""-9.

1. "& """%A '"'C&&9B %&!' .

8.  F!"'%" /"  .

2. ="&  !"  %  FL !-  ="&" ""  "  !"'  ""G  %  %' % 86 B" %0   =  !"0 % "9 ='%'" D)JMN"J=F33662  E!"-%""& 0"%%"  !9="&'& (" .?1%='%'"" "9='%'"%,5 B 166> D E@  &'&" % "" %  %F"   & =   &H%!"- !" "/ "%"" %&% "@%  G " %"'  "9 ='%'" !" - !   !" - ' "F ( %  % A" . 21  .  !"'  ""G     !0  ! % "" -F'&&&H%!"-%- G "B CA-.   /"==0"  "'%      #"* O "P 

!="&%!"' ""G   ='(!" FLCL==='%'" %"!"/"==



4256741665