Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
ATAS/1022/2020 • CJ GE ATAS/1022/2020 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal in Complementary Benefits Recalculation Case

Numero d'incarto ATAS/1022/2020
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

A litigant appealed a decision from the complementary benefits service that recalculated their entitlement to benefits for the period from May 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020; however, the court noted that the appeal was withdrawn by the appellant via a letter dated October 14, 2020, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Appeal Withdrawal in Complementary Benefits Recalculation Case: A litigant appealed a decision from the complementary benefits service that recalculated their entitlement to benefits for the period from May 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020; however, the court noted that the appeal was withdrawn by the appellant via a letter dated October 14, 2020, leading the Social Insurance Chamber to formally acknowledge the withdrawal and strike the case from the court roll.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca di prestazioni sociali diritto alle prestazioni assicurative ricalcolo delle prestazioni complementari rendita complementare riesame da parte dell'assicuratore ripristino delle prestazioni d'invalidità

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This article is cited implicitly as the court order relates to the costs following the withdrawal of the appeal, although the final disposition does not explicitly contain a cost order provision, the procedure implies that costs rules are applicable or are governed by standard procedural rules when an action is withdrawn.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/854/2020

### [ATAS/1022/2020](/apps/decis/fr/atas/show/2554799) du 29.10.2020 ( PC ) , RETIRE

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/atas/file//2020/0010/ATAS_001022_2020_A_854_2020.pdf)

rÉpublique et · canton de genÈve

POUVOIR JUDICIAIRE

A/854/2020 ATAS/1022/2020 COUR DE JUSTICE Chambre des assurances sociales

Arrêt du 29 octobre 2020 3ème Chambre

En la cause

Madame A______, domiciliée à GENÈVE, comparant avec élection de domicile en l'étude de Maître Monique STOLLER FÜLLEMANN · recourante

contre

SERVICE DES PRESTATIONS COMPLÉMENTAIRES, DCS - SPC, sis route de Chêne 54, GENÈVE · intimé

Vu la décision sur oppositions du 6 février 2020 du Service des prestations complémentaires (ci-après : SPC) recalculant le droit aux prestations de Madame A______ pour la période du 1er mai 2018 au 29 février 2020 ;

Vu le recours interjeté par l'intéressée le 31 mars 2020 ;

Vu la réponse de l'intimé du 9 avril 2020 ;

Attendu que, par courrier du 14 octobre 2020, le recours a été retiré ;

Qu'il convient d'en prendre acte et de rayer la cause du rôle.

PAR CES MOTIFS,

LA CHAMBRE DES ASSURANCES SOCIALES :

1. Prend acte du retrait du recours.

2. Raye la cause du rôle.

La greffière Marie-Catherine SÉCHAUD · La Présidente Karine STECK

Une copie conforme du présent arrêt est notifiée aux parties par le greffe le