Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
ATAS/224/2006 • CJ GE ATAS/224/2006 Generato dall'IA

Contract Amendment Validity Dispute

Numero d'incarto ATAS/224/2006
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The dispute centered on the validity of a contract amendment which allegedly altered settlement terms for a prior agreement, with one party claiming the original contract governed based on a clear, unambiguous term, while the other argued the amendment controlled due to subsequent actions and modifications. The court reasoned that the original agreement's provision was absolute and controlling, rendering the subsequent purported amendment invalid because it failed to meet the express conditions required for modification outlined within the original contract itself, thus affirming the original terms.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Contract Amendment Validity Dispute: The court reasoned that the original agreement's provision was absolute and controlling, rendering the subsequent purported amendment invalid because it failed to meet the express conditions required for modification outlined within the original contract itself, thus affirming the original terms.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
validità del contratto modificazione delle conclusioni fine del processo incostituzionalità parte contraente clausola abusiva

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF
This provision governs the allocation of court costs, as cited in order 5.
Generato dall'IA
A/1256/2006
Contract Amendment Validity and Consideration Dispute
A/1487/2002
Contract Validity and Modification Dispute
A/2841/2007
Contract Modification Validity Dispute
A/1104/2004
Contract Modification Validity and Consideration Dispute
A/1392/2004
Contract Amendment Validity and Mutual Assent

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision governs the allocation of court costs, as cited in order 5.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

                

 

!  "!#$ %#&#$   !#%  &% $ 

%'(    ) (  



*  $ +      +&# &# &'&  %&$$ % , &! $  $  &#   - !    ,&.#% $!"" !#$!% &'!#((#



 

/0000000000!  )) *++++++++++, !- . &)0&  &/)&'"

       

   641$6  

&'&&4$%'- 4((5''%)&78

 )&#5&)'- 4((58

&&#(9% :' 4((;8

< & %   '= > &/ -/7?9 79?)%!     7'@  &/ %  )   ' &   ? , "  & &  ' &  $# &)'-  4((2  & 5;7;$5 0 "!  / 7'@  A"  &00)     '   '' )') &   )!B$7$5$0 "$5! &.) C&!4;7:#B0 "$5" 7'@  A &%    & 5;7;$5 0 "    %     &  D   ' & ) C  &.! &   / 7  ' & #$7$530 "/ )'))? " )/&&E?9 !  &&'!  0.)?;373320 "F++++++++++, 7DD? %  ? , '? &B')&:7:::0 "')& :7::B0 "! 'G 0$#' 4((;" ,  ' &)&? 0?7'@ " &6'&7')'&& &%'')&'.D-"   7 &    9 !   7DD ?  0)    ' & -  D & H I++++++++++ ?JK L>8  7%&7)   &!/'0D" MMM

 %  -& + $  "!#$ %#&#$   !#%  &% $ 

 122   3

425(( 6 17  * $&89

#"   ? ,N,, I !     ,  I         ,   , H , ,    *    &   &?/'&E F++++++++++, ! &&'? 9 !  ') ?  '' & ;37332 0 "!  @) ?  & B ') & :7:::0 "')&:7::B0 "! 'G 0$#' 4((;"

4" <@&'/&-"



12(3(14((5  6$1$6   $" ?F++++++++++, &/7 A&% ''&;373320 "  &&'?9  7DD ? )D  '? &B ')&:7:::0 "')&:7::B0 "! 'G 0?0'  4((;"

2" <@&'/&-"

5" /7&6'&7')'&&&% '')&'.D-"

;" %&'& ? ' -&% '@ 0&) ?&)0& "

:" / )& D "

B" &< "5( !0 ' &/<%0 '     ) C&&)&$(9 &G0  ''&)& ) -0)&) & !,LOP L0/;!;((2   ! .' "&)C  D)"')' &= Q&/ .'/&)  &) - & &)/)8-Q.  /'0'% &'&   &)8Q  D &  )",')'       ))' )') )    Q -Q  Q 6&!  -0)&) &    'G    /< &% &)   %-"')' &  '  '@ &  %! /   9!  /  &) /)  <% & /)).)&)  R "#$4!#(;#(BQ"    D 00 =  )&=         --





0 '& ) C0).  D 00





12(3(14((5