Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
A/1529/2005 • TAPI GE A/1529/2005 Generato dall'IA

Succession Property Partition Appeal: Deviation from Initial Claims Barred

Numero d'incarto A/1529/2005
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Ginevra (CH-GE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerns an appeal regarding a partition of succession property, where the appellant challenged the lower court's decision by submitting conclusions that deviated from those initially presented, specifically concerning the division of assets and the allocation of specific shares. The court rejected the appeal, holding that according to procedural law provisions governing successions, a party cannot introduce new conclusions or claims on appeal that were not previously submitted to the initial court, emphasizing that the appeal is limited to examining the grounds raised in the original proceedings unless otherwise permitted by law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

LDS.67.1, LPA.65; Succession Property Partition Appeal: Deviation from Initial Claims Barred: The court rejected the appeal, holding that according to procedural law provisions governing successions, a party cannot introduce new conclusions or claims on appeal that were not previously submitted to the initial court, emphasizing that the appeal is limited to examining the grounds raised in the original proceedings unless otherwise permitted by law.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto successorio legittimazione a ricorrere bene riservato sostanza azione parziale mutamento di giurisprudenza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
LDS.67.1
The appeal was dismissed because the conclusion was not sufficiently motivated according to this provision.
LPA.65
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the conclusion lacked the required support or lacked a clear request.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
LDS.67.1

The appeal was dismissed because the conclusion was not sufficiently motivated according to this provision.

LPA.65

The appeal was declared inadmissible because the conclusion lacked the required support or lacked a clear request.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

A/1529/2005

### [DCRI/170/2007](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/show/1602075) du 07.05.2007 ( ICC ) , REJETE

Descripteurs :

; DROIT DES SUCCESSIONS ; CONDITION DE RECEVABILITÉ ; CONCLUSIONS

Normes :

LPA.65; LDS.67.1; LDS.14

[![Pdf]()](/apps/decis/fr/dccr/file/2007/0001/DCRI_000170_2007_A_1529_2005.pdf)

* /