Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
SB.2013.41 • APG BS SB.2013.41 Generato dall'IA

Appellants v. State (Bodily Harm and Traffic Violation Acquittal)

Numero d'incarto SB.2013.41
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Basilea Città (CH-BS)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Spese processuali a carico del ricorrente / reclamante
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Two appellants, charged with simple bodily harm and, for one, gross violation of traffic regulations, appealed a lower court's judgment concerning an incident where they were accused of injuring a victim. The appellate court reviewed the conviction and determined that the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish the necessary elements for the alleged offenses, leading it to overturn the prior decision and acquit both appellants.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 423 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO, Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO, Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO; Appellants v. State (Bodily Harm and Traffic Violation Acquittal): The appellate court reviewed the conviction and determined that the evidence presented did not sufficiently establish the necessary elements for the alleged offenses, leading it to overturn the prior decision and acquit both appellants.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
lesioni personali infrazione alle norme della circolazione concorso proprio prova liberatoria incidenti della circolazione stradale motivo di revisione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 423 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO
The appeal by the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger) is rejected based on this provision.
Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal by the accused (Beschuldigter) is rejected based on this provision.
Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO
The appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office (Staatsanwaltschaft) is rejected based on this provision.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO
The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.
Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO
The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.
Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO
The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.
Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO
The Court applies this procedural rule regarding the appeal against the conviction.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVGer
Costs are imposed on the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger 1 and 2) according to this provision.
Generato dall'IA
SB.2015.60
Appellant v. State on Negligent Bodily Harm Conviction
SB.2016.13
Appeal Regarding Negligent Grievous Bodily Harm Acquittal and Traffic Offense Convictions

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 423 Abs. 1 Ziff. 1 StPO

The appeal by the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 433 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal by the accused (Beschuldigter) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 428 Abs. 1 StPO

The appeal by the Public Prosecutor's Office (Staatsanwaltschaft) is rejected based on this provision.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. a StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 429 Abs. 1 lit. b StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 429 Abs. 2 StPO

The Court confirms that the appeal is admissible based on this provision, although the primary grounds relate to other articles.

Art. 431 Abs. 1 StPO

The Court applies this procedural rule regarding the appeal against the conviction.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BVGer

Costs are imposed on the private prosecutors (Berufungskläger 1 and 2) according to this provision.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Appellationsgericht des Kantons Basel-Stadt Ausschuss

SB.2013.41

URTEIL

vom 23. Mai 2014

Mitwirkende

lic. iur. Gabriella Matefi (Vorsitz), Dr. Caroline Cron,

lic. iur. Lucienne Renaud und Gerichtsschreiber Dr. Urs Thönen

Beteiligte

A_____, geb. [...] Berufungskläger

[...] Beschuldigter

B_____*, geb. [...] Berufungskläger

[...] Beschuldigter

beide vertreten durch [...], Advokat,

[...]

gegen

Staatsanwaltschaft Basel-Stadt Berufungsbeklagte

Binningerstrasse 21, 4001 Basel

Opfer

C_____

Gegenstand

Berufung gegen ein Urteil des Einzelgerichts in Strafsachen

vom 1. Februar 2013

betreffend ad 1: einfache Körperverletzung und grobe Verletzung der

Verkehrsregeln

ad 2: einfache Körperverletzung