Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9C_490/2013 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal in OASI/DI Supplementary Benefits Case

Numero d'incarto 9C_490/2013
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an individual appealing a decision related to supplementary benefits for old-age and disability insurance. The appeal was directed against a ruling made by the Superior Court of the Canton of Schaffhausen on May 31, 2013. However, prior to the decision by the Federal Court, the individual withdrew the appeal on August 5, 2013. Consequently, the Federal Court processed the case as withdrawn and determined that no court costs would be incurred.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Appeal Withdrawal in OASI/DI Supplementary Benefits Case: The appeal was directed against a ruling made by the Superior Court of the Canton of Schaffhausen on May 31, 2013. However, prior to the decision by the Federal Court, the individual withdrew the appeal on August 5, 2013. Consequently, the Federal Court processed the case as withdrawn and determined that no court costs would be incurred.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari revoca di prestazioni sociali abbandono del procedimento finzione di ritiro legittimazione a ricorrere ritiro dell'istanza giudiziaria

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited as part of the procedure according to which the appeal is to be struck off.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Applied to waive the collection of court costs.
Generato dall'IA
9C_380/2023
Withdrawal of Appeal in Supplementary Benefits Case
9C_536/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits
I 912/06
Withdrawal of Appeal Against OASI/DI Decision
9C_864/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Occupational Benefits Case
8C_160/2007
Withdrawal of Appeal and Dismissal of Proceedings in Supplementary Benefits Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited as part of the procedure according to which the appeal is to be struck off.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Applied to waive the collection of court costs.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for the decision to strike the appeal proceedings based on the withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

63/2012/61 (2021-02-03) · sh
Supplementary Benefits Calculation for Disability Insurance Recipients
«…ichrechtlichen Angelegenheiten ans Bundesgericht gegen diesen Entscheid wurde am 5. August 2013 zurückgezogen (BGer 9C_490/2013 vom 8. August 2013). 2 Bundesgesetz über Ergänzungsleistungen zur Alters-, Hinterlassenen- und Invaliden- v…»

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

9C_490/2013

Verfügung vom 8. August 2013

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichter Kernen, Präsident,

Gerichtsschreiber Fessler.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

D.________,

vertreten durch Rechtsanwalt Sebastian Lorentz, substituiert durch Rechtsanwalt Thomas Wyss,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

Sozialversicherungsamt Schaffhausen,

AHV-Ausgleichskasse,

Oberstadt 9, 8200 Schaffhausen,

Beschwerdegegner.

Gegenstand

Ergänzungsleistung zur AHV/IV,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid

des Obergerichts des Kantons Schaffhausen

vom 31. Mai 2013.

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 5. August 2013, worin D.________ die Beschwerde vom 3. Juli 2013 gegen den Entscheid des Obergerichts des Kantons Schaffhausen vom 31. Mai 2013 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten zu verzichten ist,

verfügt der Präsident:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Obergericht des Kantons Schaffhausen und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 8. August 2013

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Der Präsident: Kernen

Der Gerichtsschreiber: Fessler