Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9C_412/2018 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV

Numero d'incarto 9C_412/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a complaint regarding supplemental benefits to the old-age and survivors' insurance/disability insurance systems, which was directed against a decision made by the insurance court of a Swiss canton. The complainant decided to withdraw the complaint, leading to the closure of the procedure. Consequently, no court fees were imposed in relation to the withdrawn complaint.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV: The complainant decided to withdraw the complaint, leading to the closure of the procedure. Consequently, no court fees were imposed in relation to the withdrawn complaint.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
prestazioni complementari all'AVS soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione ritiro della domanda decisioni in materia medica memoria complementare preavviso in materia di assicurazioni sociali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for dismissing the case due to withdrawal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for dismissing the case due to withdrawal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG to determine the applicable procedure for dismissal upon withdrawal.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Applied to waive the collection of court fees when the appeal is withdrawn.
Generato dall'IA
9C_81/2012
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV
9C_64/2016
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary AHV/IV Benefits
9C_784/2014
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary Benefits to AHV/IV
9C_158/2015
Withdrawal of Appeal for Supplementary Benefits (AHV/IV)
9C_314/2020
Withdrawal of Appeal Regarding Supplementary AHV/IV Benefits

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG to determine the applicable procedure for dismissal upon withdrawal.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Applied to waive the collection of court fees when the appeal is withdrawn.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP as the basis for dismissing the case due to withdrawal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG as the basis for dismissing the case due to withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

9C_242/2018 (2019-02-21)
«…ung von Kleinkindern (einlässlich dazu: Urteil 9C_178/2016 vom 17. Juni 2016 E. 3.2 mit Hinweisen; bestätigt mit Urteil 9C_412/2018 vom 6. August 2018). 4.2. Ernsthafte sachliche Anhaltspunkte für eine Praxisänderung ergeben sich weder aus dem angefo…»

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_412/2018

Verfügung vom 17. September 2018

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichter Parrino, als Einzelrichter,

Gerichtsschreiber Grünenfelder.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

A.________, vertreten durch Fürsprech Jürg Walker,

Beschwerdeführerin,

gegen

Ausgleichskasse des Kantons Solothurn, Allmendweg 6, 4528 Zuchwil,

Beschwerdegegnerin.

Gegenstand

Ergänzungsleistung zur AHV/IV,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Versicherungsgerichts des Kantons Solothurn vom 30. April 2018 (VSBES.2018.27).

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 31. August 2018, worin A.________ die Beschwerde vom 30. Mai 2018 (Poststempel) gegen den Entscheid des Versicherungsgerichts des Kantons Solothurn vom 30. April 2018 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten verzichtet wird,

verfügt der Einzelrichter:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Versicherungsgericht des Kantons Solothurn und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 17. September 2018

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Der Einzelrichter: Parrino

Der Gerichtsschreiber: Grünenfelder