Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9C_22/2015 Generato dall'IA

Discontinuation of Invalidity Insurance Appeal Due to Withdrawal

Numero d'incarto 9C_22/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a complaint concerning invalidity insurance, where the complainant filed a grievance against a decision made by the Administrative Court of the Canton of Bern on November 21, 2014. Subsequently, the complainant opted to withdraw their complaint through a letter received on March 2, 2015. Consequently, the court noted the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the discontinuation of proceedings without imposing court costs. The ruling will be communicated to the relevant parties and authorities involved in the case.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Discontinuation of Invalidity Insurance Appeal Due to Withdrawal: Subsequently, the complainant opted to withdraw their complaint through a letter received on March 2, 2015. Consequently, the court noted the withdrawal of the appeal, leading to the discontinuation of proceedings without imposing court costs. The ruling will be communicated to the relevant parties and authorities involved in the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione invalidità abbandono del procedimento soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione vertenza di assicurazione sociale insolvenza dell'assicuratore ammortamento di titoli di credito

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP for the decision to strike the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG for the decision to strike the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited as part of the procedure under which the case is struck from the roll.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Applied as the basis for waiving court costs, as reflected in order number 2.
Generato dall'IA
9C_123/2016
Discontinuation of Invalidity Insurance Appeal Due to Withdrawal
9C_234/2014
Withdrawal of Appeal in Invalidity Insurance Case
8C_985/2008
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
8C_419/2008
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case
9C_573/2018
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited as part of the procedure under which the case is struck from the roll.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Applied as the basis for waiving court costs, as reflected in order number 2.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP for the decision to strike the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG for the decision to strike the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

200 2018 225 (2018-07-31) · be
Claimant Fails to Establish Rent-Qualifying Change for Disability Benefits Despite New Medical Diagnoses
«…r IVB [act. IIA] 104 S. 2 ff.) zog der Versicherte wieder zurück (Entscheid des Bundesgerichts [BGer] vom 9. März 2015, 9C_22/2015 [act. IIA 112]), nachdem das Bundesgericht sein Gesuch um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege abgewiesen hatte (Akten der IVB […»

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

9C_22/2015

Verfügung vom 9. März 2015

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichterin Glanzmann, Präsidentin,

Gerichtsschreiber Grünenfelder.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

A.________, vertreten durch

Rechtsanwalt Thomas Biedermann,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

IV-Stelle Bern, Scheibenstrasse 70, 3014 Bern,

Beschwerdegegnerin.

Gegenstand

Invalidenversicherung,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Verwaltungsgerichts des Kantons Bern vom 21. November 2014.

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 27. Februar 2015 (eingegangen am 2. März 2015), worin A.________ die Beschwerde vom 9. Januar 2015 (Poststempel) gegen den Entscheid des Verwaltungsgerichts des Kantons Bern vom 21. November 2014 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten verzichtet wird,

verfügt die Präsidentin:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Bern, Sozialversicherungsrechtliche Abteilung, und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 9. März 2015

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Die Präsidentin: Glanzmann

Der Gerichtsschreiber: Grünenfelder