Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9C_198/2012 Generato dall'IA

Cantonal Department of Internal Affairs v. Cantonal Insurance Court (Competence for Nursing Care Costs)

Numero d'incarto 9C_198/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a dispute regarding health insurance and the financing of care costs in the context of appeals made by the Department of the Interior of a canton against a decision made by the cantonal insurance court. The cantonal court had decided not to accept complaints related to the residual financing of care costs and referred the matter to the Department of the Interior. Following this, the Federal Tribunal determined that the cantonal court had the material jurisdiction to decide on the financing, leading to the conclusion that the previous appeal was no longer relevant, resulting in the case being dismissed as moot. No court costs were incurred, and notifications about the decision were sent to the relevant parties.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG; Cantonal Department of Internal Affairs v. Cantonal Insurance Court (Competence for Nursing Care Costs): The cantonal court had decided not to accept complaints related to the residual financing of care costs and referred the matter to the Department of the Interior. Following this, the Federal Tribunal determined that the cantonal court had the material jurisdiction to decide on the financing, leading to the conclusion that the previous appeal was no longer relevant, resulting in the case being dismissed as moot. No court costs were incurred, and notifications about the decision were sent to the relevant parties.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
finanziamento dell'assicurazione procedura direttrice decisione incidentale impugnabile responsabilità ospedaliera decisioni in materia medica assicurazione di protezione giuridica

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Used to dismiss the procedure because the appeal had become moot after a related decision.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG
Rule applied because no court costs were ordered in the dispositive.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
9C_197/2012
Jurisdictional Dispute Over Supplementary Care Financing and Application of ATSG Procedural Rules
Generato dall'IA
BGE 138 V 377
Cantonal Jurisdiction for Residual Nursing Care Financing Appeal: Insurance Court vs. Interior Department
9C_115/2013
Department of the Interior v. Insured Person (Interlocutory Decision on Nursing Benefits)
8C_311/2022
Insurance Agency v. Cantonal Court (Interlocutory Appeal on Remand Order)
9C_726/2013
Federal Supreme Court on Appealability of Interlocutory Decisions in Invalidity Insurance Matters
8C_155/2013
Invalidity Insurance Office v. Cantonal Court (Interlocutory Judgment on Legal Aid Costs)

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Used to dismiss the procedure because the appeal had become moot after a related decision.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 BGG

Rule applied because no court costs were ordered in the dispositive.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

9C_198/2012

Verfügung vom 10. September 2012

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichterin Pfiffner Rauber, als Einzelrichterin,

Gerichtsschreiberin Bollinger Hammerle.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

Departement des Innern des Kantons St. Gallen, Regierungsgebäude, 9001 St. Gallen,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

Sozialversicherungsanstalt des Kantons St. Gallen, Brauerstrasse 54, 9016 St. Gallen,

Beschwerdegegnerin.

Gegenstand

Krankenversicherung,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Versicherungsgerichts des Kantons St. Gallen

vom 19. Januar 2012.

Nach Einsicht

in die Beschwerde des Departements des Innern des Kantons St. Gallen vom 29. Februar 2012, mit welcher das Departement unter Aufhebung des angefochtenen Entscheides des Versicherungsgerichts des Kantons St. Gallen vom 19. Januar 2012 die Rückweisung der Sache an das kantonale Gericht zum materiellen Entscheid beantragt,

in Erwägung,

dass das Versicherungsgericht des Kantons St. Gallen am 19. Januar 2012 entschied, auf Beschwerden der S.________ sowie des Kantons Wallis betreffend die Restfinanzierung von Pflegekosten sei nicht einzutreten und die Beschwerden seien (nach Eintritt der Rechtskraft) zuständigkeitshalber dem Departement des Innern des Kantons St. Gallen zu überweisen,

dass das Bundesgericht mit Urteil 9C_197/2012 vom 7. September 2012 entschied, das kantonale Versicherungsgericht sei zum materiellen Entscheid über die Restfinanzierung der Pflegekosten sachlich zuständig, was zum nachträglichen Dahinfallen des beschwerdeführerischen Rechtsschutzinteresses führt und daher das Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

verfügt die Einzelrichterin:

1. Das Verfahren wird als gegenstandslos abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Versicherungsgericht des Kantons St. Gallen, S.________ und dem Kanton Wallis schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 10. September 2012

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Die Einzelrichterin:

Die Gerichtsschreiberin:

Pfiffner Rauber Bollinger Hammerle