Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
9C_192/2018 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Matter

Numero d'incarto 9C_192/2018
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves an individual who filed a complaint against a decision made by the Cantonal Court regarding invalidity insurance. The individual later withdrew their petition after their request for free legal assistance was denied. Consequently, the tribunal decided to formally dismiss the case due to the withdrawal of the complaint and determined that no court fees would be imposed.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG; Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Matter: The individual later withdrew their petition after their request for free legal assistance was denied. Consequently, the tribunal decided to formally dismiss the case due to the withdrawal of the complaint and determined that no court fees would be imposed.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicurazione invalidità revoca del gratuito patrocinio vertenza di assicurazione sociale assicurazione di protezione giuridica insolvenza dell'assicuratore procedimento di dichiarazione di nullità e rinuncia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with other provisions as the legal basis for the disposal of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in conjunction with other provisions as the legal basis for the disposal of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited in conjunction with other provisions defining the procedure used for the disposal of the case.
Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG
Applied as the basis for the decision not to levy court costs.
Generato dall'IA
9C_551/2015
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
9C_1012/2009
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
9C_997/2010
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Matter
9C_918/2014
Withdrawal of Invalidity Insurance Appeal
9C_625/2016
Appeal Withdrawal in Invalidity Insurance Case

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited in conjunction with other provisions defining the procedure used for the disposal of the case.

Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG

Applied as the basis for the decision not to levy court costs.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with other provisions as the legal basis for the disposal of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in conjunction with other provisions as the legal basis for the disposal of the case following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

2018.01.04.sv.4 (2018-01-04) · bl
Mechanic's Eczema: No Further Training Approved
«…gen dieses Urteil wurde am 26. Februar 2018 Beschwerde beim Bundesgericht eingereicht (siehe nach Vorliegen des Urteils 9C_192/2018) http://www.bl.ch/kantonsgericht Seite 9…»

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

9C_192/2018

Verfügung vom 26. April 2018

II. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichter Parrino, als Einzelrichter,

Gerichtsschreiberin Keel Baumann.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

A.________,

vertreten durch Advokat Patrick Frey,

Beschwerdeführer,

gegen

IV-Stelle Basel-Landschaft, Hauptstrasse 109, 4102 Binningen,

Beschwerdegegnerin.

Gegenstand

Invalidenversicherung,

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft vom 4. Januar 2018 (720 17 265 / 06).

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 19. April 2018, worin A.________ die Beschwerde vom 26. Februar 2018 (Poststempel) gegen den Entscheid des Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht, vom 4. Januar 2018 zurückzieht, nachdem sein Gesuch um unentgeltliche Rechtspflege mit Verfügung vom 28. März 2018 abgewiesen worden ist,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist,

dass in Anwendung von Art. 66 Abs. 2 BGG auf die Erhebung von Gerichtskosten verzichtet wird,

verfügt der Einzelrichter:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Gerichtskosten erhoben.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Kantonsgericht Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht, und dem Bundesamt für Sozialversicherungen schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 26. April 2018

Im Namen der II. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Der Einzelrichter: Parrino

Die Gerichtsschreiberin: Keel Baumann