Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
8C_886/2010 Generato dall'IA

Insurer Withdraws Appeal on Definition of Accident, Proceedings Terminated

Numero d'incarto 8C_886/2010
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

In this case, a complaint was filed by an insurance company regarding a decision made by the Cantonal Court of Basel-Landschaft concerning the interpretation of accident insurance. The company subsequently withdrew its complaint on December 23, 2010, which led to the court proceeding being archived. As a result of the withdrawal, the court imposed costs on the insurance company.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 und 3 BGG; Insurer Withdraws Appeal on Definition of Accident, Proceedings Terminated: The company subsequently withdrew its complaint on December 23, 2010, which led to the court proceeding being archived. As a result of the withdrawal, the court imposed costs on the insurance company.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
assicuratore infortuni stralcio del procedimento fondamento della responsabilità soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione riesame da parte dell'assicuratore regolamento interno

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in consideration as the basis, in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, for terminating the appellate procedure following withdrawal.
Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP
Cited in consideration as the basis, in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG, for the termination of the procedure following withdrawal.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited in consideration as the procedural context governing the termination of the procedure.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 und 3 BGG
Cited in consideration as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs.
Generato dall'IA
8C_161/2010
Insurer Withdrawal of Appeal in Accident Insurance Case
8C_38/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal in Accident Insurance Dispute and Termination of Proceedings
8C_508/2013
Withdrawal of Appeal in Accident Insurance Case
8C_275/2014
Appeal Withdrawal in Accident Insurance Matter
8C_685/2008
Claimant Withdraws Appeal Against Accident Insurance Decision; Proceedings Terminated

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited in consideration as the procedural context governing the termination of the procedure.

Art. 66 Abs. 1 und 3 BGG

Cited in consideration as the basis for ordering the appellant to pay the court costs.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in consideration as the basis, in conjunction with Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP, for terminating the appellate procedure following withdrawal.

Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP

Cited in consideration as the basis, in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG, for the termination of the procedure following withdrawal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

9C_43/2012 (2012-07-12)
«…ies das Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Schwyz ab (Entscheid vom 27. September 2010). Das Bundesgericht hiess mit Urteil 8C_886/2010 vom 10. Juni 2011 die dagegen erhobene Beschwerde von V.________ gut, hob den angefochtenen Entscheid auf und wies die…»

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

8C_886/2010

Verfügung vom 4. Januar 2011

I. sozialrechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichterin Niquille, als Einzelrichterin,

Gerichtsschreiberin Polla.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

Zürich Versicherungs-Gesellschaft AG, Litigation Hauptbranchen, 8085 Zürich Versicherung,

Beschwerdeführerin,

gegen

V.________, vertreten durch

Advokat Nikolaus Tamm,

Beschwerdegegner.

Gegenstand

Unfallversicherung (Unfallbegriff),

Beschwerde gegen den Entscheid des

Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft vom 1. September 2010.

Nach Einsicht

in das Schreiben vom 23. Dezember 2010, worin die Zürich Versicherungs-Gesellschaft AG die Beschwerde vom 25. Oktober 2010 (Poststempel) gegen den Entscheid des Kantonsgerichts Basel-Landschaft vom 1. September 2010 zurückzieht,

in Erwägung,

dass die Beschwerde gemäss Art. 71 BGG in Verbindung mit Art. 73 Abs. 1 BZP im Verfahren nach Art. 32 Abs. 2 BGG abzuschreiben ist und die Beschwerdeführerin nach Art. 66 Abs. 1 und 3 BGG kostenpflichtig wird,

verfügt die Einzelrichterin:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs der Beschwerde abgeschrieben.

2. Die Gerichtskosten von Fr. 200.- werden der Beschwerdeführerin auferlegt.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Parteien, dem Kantonsgericht Basel-Landschaft, Abteilung Sozialversicherungsrecht, und dem Bundesamt für Gesundheit schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Luzern, 4. Januar 2011

Im Namen der I. sozialrechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Die Einzelrichterin: Die Gerichtsschreiberin:

Niquille Polla