Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
8C_474/2015 Generato dall'IA

Neuchâtel Unemployment Insurance Fund Withdraws Appeal, Case Dismissed

Numero d'incarto 8C_474/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a dispute regarding unemployment insurance, where the unemployment insurance fund initiated a legal action against a claimant following a decision made by the public law court at the cantonal level. The unemployment insurance fund filed for an appeal but subsequently withdrew this appeal in a letter prior to the tribunal's decision. Consequently, the court decided to dismiss the case from its agenda due to the withdrawal of the appeal, resulting in no judicial costs being incurred, while also awarding the opposing party a sum for their legal expenses.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 73 al. 1 PCF, Art. 66 al. 2 LTF, Art. 68 al. 2 LTF, Art. 68 al. 1 LTF, art. 32 al. 2 LTF, art. 71 LTF; Neuchâtel Unemployment Insurance Fund Withdraws Appeal, Case Dismissed: The unemployment insurance fund filed for an appeal but subsequently withdrew this appeal in a letter prior to the tribunal's decision. Consequently, the court decided to dismiss the case from its agenda due to the withdrawal of the appeal, resulting in no judicial costs being incurred, while also awarding the opposing party a sum for their legal expenses.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassa di disoccupazione assicurazione pubblica diritto processuale soppressione della prestazione d'assicurazione disoccupazione abbandono definitivo del procedimento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 73 al. 1 PCF
Cited as a procedural ground, in conjunction with other articles, for striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Applied to rule that no judicial costs shall be collected.
Art. 68 al. 2 LTF
Applied to award costs (dépens) to the respondent for their submissions before the Federal Tribunal.
Art. 68 al. 1 LTF
Applied when determining the amount of the costs owed to the respondent.
art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited as a ground, in conjunction with other articles, for striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.
art. 71 LTF
Cited as a ground, in conjunction with other articles, for striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.
Generato dall'IA
8C_470/2015
Unemployment Insurance Fund Appeal Withdrawn
8C_473/2015
Cantonal Unemployment Insurance Fund v. Cantonal Court (Withdrawal of Appeal)
8C_471/2015
Unemployment Insurance Appeal Withdrawn and Case Struck from Docket
8C_602/2008
Withdrawal of Unemployment Insurance Appeal
8C_895/2008
Claimant Withdraws Unemployment Insurance Appeal; Case Dismissed.

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited as a ground, in conjunction with other articles, for striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.

Art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Applied to rule that no judicial costs shall be collected.

Art. 68 al. 2 LTF

Applied to award costs (dépens) to the respondent for their submissions before the Federal Tribunal.

Art. 68 al. 1 LTF

Applied when determining the amount of the costs owed to the respondent.

art. 71 LTF

Cited as a ground, in conjunction with other articles, for striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 73 al. 1 PCF

Cited as a procedural ground, in conjunction with other articles, for striking the case from the roll due to withdrawal of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (1)

8C_469/2015 (2016-02-26)
«…ant les cinq autres anciens travailleurs de B.________ SA (causes 8C_470/2015, 8C_471/2015, 8C_472/2015, 8C_473/2015 et 8C_474/2015). Elle demande au Tribunal fédéral de joindre les six causes et de statuer en un seul et même arrêt. Considérant en dro…»

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

8C_474/2015

Ordonnance du 21 mars 2016

Ire Cour de droit social

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Frésard, en qualité de juge unique.

Greffière : Mme Castella.

Participants à la procédure

Caisse cantonale neuchâteloise d'assurance-chômage, avenue Léopold-Robert 11a, 2300 La Chaux-de-Fonds,

recourante,

contre

E.________,

représenté par Me Sandrine Chiavazza, avocate,

intimé.

Objet

Assurance-chômage (retrait du recours),

recours contre le jugement de la Cour de droit public

du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel du 29 mai 2015.

Vu :

la lettre du 17 mars 2016 par laquelle la Caisse cantonale neuchâteloise d'assurance-chômage a déclaré retirer le recours interjeté le 29 juin 2015 (timbre postal) contre un jugement de la Cour de droit public du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel du 29 mai 2015

considérant :

que la cause doit être rayée du rôle en application des art. 32 al. 2 et 71 LTF , en relation avec l' art. 73 al. 1 PCF (RS 273),

qu'il se justifie, en application de l' art. 66 al. 2 LTF , de statuer sans frais judiciaires,

qu'il y a lieu d'accorder des dépens à l'intimé pour ses déterminations conformément à l' art. 68 al. 2 LTF ,

qu'il convient d'en fixer le montant en tenant compte du fait que les griefs soulevés sont identiques dans des procédures parallèles où les parties intimées, représentées par la même avocate, ont également droit à des dépens ( art. 68 al. 1 LTF ),

par ces motifs, le Juge unique ordonne :

1. La cause est radiée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires.

3. La recourante versera à l'intimé la somme de 700 fr. à titre de dépens pour la procédure devant le Tribunal fédéral.

4. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties, à la Cour de droit public du Tribunal cantonal de la République et canton de Neuchâtel et au Secrétariat d'Etat à l'économie (SECO).

Lucerne, le 21 mars 2016

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit social

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Juge unique : Frésard

La Greffière : Castella