Provisional Measures Withdrawal in Divorce Appeal: Cost Allocation
Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe case involves a divorce dispute where one party filed a civil appeal to the Federal Tribunal against a decision made by the District Court regarding provisional measures. The appeal was submitted after the District Court's ruling on March 26, 2010. Subsequently, the appeal was put on hold pending another nullity plea in the cantonal court, which ultimately accepted the plea on January 13, 2011, leading to the annulment of the contested judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings. On March 1, 2011, the appellant withdrew the appeal and requested a waiver of costs, resulting in the case being removed from the Tribunal's agenda. The court noted that since the appellant withdrew, they would bear the judicial costs, and no costs were awarded to either party as the other was not invited to respond to the appeal.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAArt. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 66 al 1 LTF, Art. 68 al. 1 LTF; Provisional Measures Withdrawal in Divorce Appeal: Cost Allocation: The appeal was submitted after the District Court's ruling on March 26, 2010. Subsequently, the appeal was put on hold pending another nullity plea in the cantonal court, which ultimately accepted the plea on January 13, 2011, leading to the annulment of the contested judgment and remanding the case for further proceedings. On March 1, 2011, the appellant withdrew the appeal and requested a waiver of costs, resulting in the case being removed from the Tribunal's agenda. The court noted that since the appellant withdrew, they would bear the judicial costs, and no costs were awarded to either party as the other was not invited to respond to the appeal.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADisposizioni normative citate
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IACited in the considerations regarding taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll.
Cited in order 2 as the basis for charging the judicial costs to the appellant due to withdrawal.
Cited in order 3 as the basis for not awarding costs because the appellant ultimately failed.
Cited by reference in the considerations as the provision ensuring the application of procedural law (PCF) to the federal appeal.
Cited by reference (via art. 71 LTF) in the considerations to justify taking note of the withdrawal and striking the case from the roll, as confirmed in order 1.
Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (3)
Testo completo
Bundesgericht
Tribunal fédéral
Tribunale federale
Tribunal federal
{T 0/2}
5A_330/2010
Ordonnance du 3 mars 2011
IIe Cour de droit civil
Composition
Mme la Juge Hohl, Présidente.
Greffier: M. Fellay.
Participants à la procédure
A.________, (époux),
représenté par Me Laurent Maire, avocat,
recourant,
contre
dame A.________, (épouse),
représentée par Me Mireille Loroch, avocate,
intimée.
Objet
mesures provisionnelles (divorce),
recours contre le jugement du Tribunal d'arrondissement de La Côte du 26 mars 2010.
Vu:
le recours en matière civile adressé au Tribunal fédéral le 27 avril 2010;
l'ordonnance présidentielle du 29 avril 2010, suspendant l'instruction du recours en matière civile jusqu'à droit connu sur un recours en nullité déposé simultanément auprès de la Chambre des recours du Tribunal cantonal vaudois;
l'arrêt de cette autorité du 13 janvier 2011, admettant le recours cantonal, annulant le jugement attaqué et renvoyant la cause en première instance pour nouvelle instruction et nouvelle décision;
la déclaration de retrait du recours du 1er mars 2011, assortie d'une demande de renonciation aux frais (art. 66 al. 1 in fine LTF) et d'allocation de dépens;
considérant:
qu'il convient de prendre acte du retrait et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF );
que du fait de son désistement, le recourant doit être considéré comme la partie qui succombe au sens de l'art. 66 al 1 LTF, de sorte qu'il doit assumer les frais judiciaires;
qu'il n'y a lieu d'allouer des dépens ni au recourant, qui succombe ( art. 68 al. 1 LTF ), ni à l'intimée, qui n'a pas été invitée à répondre au recours;
par ces motifs, la Présidente ordonne:
1. Il est pris acte du retrait du recours et la cause est rayée du rôle.
2. Les frais judiciaires, arrêtés à 500 fr., sont mis à la charge du recourant.
3. Il n'est pas alloué de dépens.
4. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux participants à la procédure et au Tribunal d'arrondissement de La Côte.
Lausanne, le 3 mars 2011
Au nom de la IIe Cour de droit civil
du Tribunal fédéral suisse
La Présidente: Le Greffier:
Hohl Fellay