Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
4A_49/2015 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawn Civil Appeal Legal Aid Denial and Cost Award

Numero d'incarto 4A_49/2015
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a legal dispute in which the defendants, represented by an official guardianship and their attorney, appealed against a decision from the Cantonal Court's appellate division. The appeal was related to a previous ruling made in December 2014. However, prior to the proceedings, the defendants submitted a letter indicating their intention to withdraw the appeal while also requesting legal aid. The Federal Tribunal determined that withdrawing the appeal concluded the matter, deemed the appeal as lacking merit, and consequently rejected the request for legal aid. The tribunal also decided that no court fees would be charged, but the appellants were ordered to compensate the opposing party for legal expenses incurred.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 64 al. 1 LTF, Art. 64 al. 3 LTF, Art. 66 al. 1 LTF; Withdrawn Civil Appeal Legal Aid Denial and Cost Award: The appeal was related to a previous ruling made in December 2014. However, prior to the proceedings, the defendants submitted a letter indicating their intention to withdraw the appeal while also requesting legal aid. The Federal Tribunal determined that withdrawing the appeal concluded the matter, deemed the appeal as lacking merit, and consequently rejected the request for legal aid. The tribunal also decided that no court fees would be charged, but the appellants were ordered to compensate the opposing party for legal expenses incurred.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
revoca del gratuito patrocinio assistenza giudiziaria in materia civile spese legali presupposti materiali legittimazione a ricorrere annullamento civile

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 64 al. 3 LTF

The decision on the request for legal aid was made in the composition of three judges as required by this article.

Art. 64 al. 1 LTF

The request for legal aid was rejected based on this provision because the appeal was clearly without prospect of success.

Art. 66 al. 1 LTF

This provision was implicitly used to order the payment of costs (indemnité de dépens in order 4).

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Sentenze successive che citano questa decisione (5)

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

4A_49/2015

Ordonnance du 29 avril 2015

Ire Cour de droit civil

Composition

Mmes les juges Kiss, présidente, Klett et Hohl.

Greffier : M. Thélin.

Participants à la procédure

H.A.________ et F.A.________,

agissant par Daniel Studer, office des curatelles et tutelles officielles, et

représentés par Me Marcel Paris,

défendeurs et recourants,

contre

Syndicat B.________,

représenté par Me Fabien Hohenauer,

demandeur et intimé.

Objet

retrait du recours; demande d'assistance judiciaire

recours contre l'arrêt rendu le 19 décembre 2014 par la Cour d'appel du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Vu :

la demande d'assistance judiciaire jointe au recours;

la prise de position de l'association intimée relative à une demande d'effet suspensif;

la lettre de Me Paris datée du 23 avril 2015 par laquelle ce mandataire annonce le retrait du recours mais confirme la demande d'assistance judiciaire;

Considérant :

Que le retrait du recours met fin à la cause;

Que ce pourvoi était manifestement dépourvu de chances de succès;

Que pour ce motif déjà, ses auteurs ne peuvent pas obtenir l'assistance judiciaire conformément à l' art. 64 al. 1 LTF ;

Qu'à titre exceptionnel, le Tribunal fédéral peut renoncer à percevoir l'émolument judiciaire;

Que des dépens doivent être alloués à l'intimée car cette partie a pris position sur une demande d'effet suspensif;

Que la cour de céans doit statuer sur la demande d'assistance judiciaire dans la composition de trois juges prévue par l' art. 64 al. 3 LTF (ordonnance 2C_423/2007 du 27 septembre 2007, consid. 3);

Par ces motifs, le Tribunal fédéral prononce :

1. La cause est rayée du rôle.

2. La demande d'assistance judiciaire est rejetée.

3. Il n'est pas perçu d'émolument judiciaire.

4. Les recourants verseront une indemnité de 500 fr. à l'intimée, solidairement entre eux, à titre de dépens.

5. La présente ordonnance est communiquée aux parties et au Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 29 avril 2015

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit civil

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

La présidente : Kiss

Le greffier : Thélin