Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
2F_12/2021 Generato dall'IA

Withdrawal of Revision Request in Residence Permit Case

Numero d'incarto 2F_12/2021
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involved an individual, referred to as A.________, who had previously filed a complaint with the Swiss Federal Tribunal regarding a decision concerning his permanent residency permit. The tribunal had decided not to consider his complaint on March 24, 2021 (case 2C_260/2021). Subsequently, A.________ submitted a revision request against this judgment on April 19, 2021, but later withdrew this request on April 24, 2021. Consequently, the tribunal deemed the proceedings closed and decided not to impose any legal costs or award compensation to the parties involved.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 71 BGG, Art. 5 Abs. 2 BZP, Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz, Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG, Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BGG, Art. 32 Abs. 2 BZP; Withdrawal of Revision Request in Residence Permit Case: The tribunal had decided not to consider his complaint on March 24, 2021 (case 2C_260/2021). Subsequently, A.________ submitted a revision request against this judgment on April 19, 2021, but later withdrew this request on April 24, 2021. Consequently, the tribunal deemed the proceedings closed and decided not to impose any legal costs or award compensation to the parties involved.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
ritiro della domanda di revisione permessi di dimora revisione in materia civile revisione in materia d'asilo ritiro dell'autorizzazione misura di allontanamento nel diritto degli stranieri

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 71 BGG
Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 Abs. 2 BZP to justify the discontinuation of the proceedings due to the withdrawal of the revision application.
Art. 5 Abs. 2 BZP
dass das vorliegende Verfahren dementsprechend als gegenstandslos abzuschreiben ist (vgl. Art. 32 Abs. 2, Art. 71 BGG i.V.m. Art. 5 Abs. 2 BZP ),
Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz
dass es sich rechtfertigt, keine Kosten zu erheben ( Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BGG ) und keine Parteientschädigungen zuzusprechen ( Art.
Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG
Cited to justify the decision not to award any party compensation.
Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BGG
Cited to justify the decision not to levy any court costs.
Art. 32 Abs. 2 BZP
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG to justify the discontinuation of the proceedings due to the withdrawal of the revision application.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
2C_260/2021
Appellant v. Cantonal Administrative Court (Settlement Permit Appeal)
Generato dall'IA
2F_9/2022
Federal Supreme Court Revision Request Regarding Residence Permit Revocation Dismissed Due to Untimely Withdrawal Submission
2F_3/2018
Federal Supreme Court Revision Application Dismissed for Procedural Defects in Residence Permit Case
2F_6/2015
Revision Request for Late-Arising Residence Permit Grounds Dismissed
2F_23/2015
Revision of Residence Permit Revocation Dismissed
2C_483/2010
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Residence Permit Non-Renewal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BGG

Cited to justify the decision not to levy any court costs.

Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG

Cited to justify the decision not to award any party compensation.

Art. 71 BGG

Cited in conjunction with Art. 32 Abs. 2 BZP to justify the discontinuation of the proceedings due to the withdrawal of the revision application.

Art. 32 Abs. 2 BZP

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 BGG to justify the discontinuation of the proceedings due to the withdrawal of the revision application.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

2F_12/2021

Verfügung vom 29. April 2021

II. öffentlich-rechtliche Abteilung

Besetzung

Bundesrichter Seiler, Präsident,

Gerichtsschreiber Hugi Yar.

Verfahrensbeteiligte

A.________,

Gesuchsteller,

gegen

Departement des Innern des Kantons Solothurn, Migrationsamt,

Ambassadorenhof, 4509 Solothurn,

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Solothurn,

Amthaus 1, 4500 Solothurn.

Gegenstand

Niederlassungsbewilligung,

Revisionsgesuch gegen das Urteil des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts vom 24. März 2021 (2C_260/2021).

In Erwägung,

dass das Bundesgericht am 24. März 2021 auf eine Beschwerde von A.________ nicht eingetreten ist (2C_260/2021),

dass A.________ am 19. April 2021 hiergegen (sinngemäss) ein Revisionsgesuch gestellt hat,

dass er dieses am 24. April 2021 zurückgezogen hat,

dass das vorliegende Verfahren dementsprechend als gegenstandslos abzuschreiben ist (vgl. Art. 32 Abs. 2, Art. 71 BGG i.V.m. Art. 5 Abs. 2 BZP ),

dass es sich rechtfertigt, keine Kosten zu erheben ( Art. 66 Abs. 1 Satz 2 BGG ) und keine Parteientschädigungen zuzusprechen ( Art. 68 Abs. 2 BGG ),

verfügt der Präsident:

1. Das Verfahren wird infolge Rückzugs des Revisionsgesuchs abgeschrieben.

2. Es werden keine Kosten erhoben und keine Parteientschädigungen zugesprochen.

3. Diese Verfügung wird den Verfahrensbeteiligten schriftlich mitgeteilt.

Lausanne, 29. April 2021

Im Namen der II. öffentlich-rechtlichen Abteilung

des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts

Der Präsident: Seiler

Der Gerichtsschreiber: Hugi Yar