Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1B_495/2012 Generato dall'IA

Mootness of Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Extension Due to Release

Numero d'incarto 1B_495/2012
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Tribunale federale (TF / DTF) (CH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio struck_off
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case involves a legal appeal concerning the provisional detention of an individual accused of property damage, burglary, and theft, against the decision made by the Cantonal Court of Vaud. The individual had initially been detained, and their detention was extended for a maximum duration of two months. Following a ruling by the Cantonal Court affirming the continuation of the detention, the accused filed a legal appeal. However, prior to any further judicial proceedings, it was reported to the Federal Tribunal that the individual had been released, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal noted the withdrawal and decided to strike the case from its docket without imposing any legal fees or awarding costs.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 73 PCF, Art. 71 LTF, Art. 32 al. 2 LTF, Art. 428 al. 1 CPP, art. 66 al. 2 LTF, art. 68 al. 3 LTF; Mootness of Appeal Against Pre-Trial Detention Extension Due to Release: The individual had initially been detained, and their detention was extended for a maximum duration of two months. Following a ruling by the Cantonal Court affirming the continuation of the detention, the accused filed a legal appeal. However, prior to any further judicial proceedings, it was reported to the Federal Tribunal that the individual had been released, leading to the withdrawal of the appeal. Consequently, the Tribunal noted the withdrawal and decided to strike the case from its docket without imposing any legal fees or awarding costs.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
proroga della carcerazione preventiva oggetto della lite impugnabilità della decisione di rinvio sottrazione di una cosa mobile prescrizione della pena durata ragionevole del procedimento

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 73 PCF
Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 71 LTF
Cited as the provision allowing the application of Art. 73 PCF in the context of the appeal.
Art. 32 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the considerations regarding the withdrawal of the appeal.
Art. 428 al. 1 CPP
que celui qui retire un recours doit, en principe, être considéré comme une partie succombante, astreinte au paiement des frais de justice encourus jusque-là (ordonnance 9C_112/2009 du 6 juillet 2010; cf. art. 428 al. 1 CPP ),
art. 66 al. 2 LTF
Cited in the dispositive to rule that no judicial costs shall be levied.
art. 68 al. 3 LTF
Cited in the dispositive to rule that no legal costs shall be awarded.

Giurisprudenza citata

Generato dall'IA
9C_112/2009
Withdrawal of Appeals in Old-Age and Survivors' Insurance Cases; Denial of Legal Aid
Generato dall'IA
BGE 137 IV 177
Mootness of Appeal Against Detention Extension Upon Early Commencement of Sentence
7B_497/2023
Appeal Against Provisional Detention Moot Following Appellant's Release
2C_486/2010
Appeal Regarding Detention Extension Rendered Moot by Release
1B_268/2022
Appeal Against Detention Extension Dismissed as Moot Upon Appellant's Release
1B_233/2011
Withdrawal of Appeal Against Detention Extension Due to Release

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
art. 32 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the considerations regarding the withdrawal of the appeal.

art. 66 al. 2 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to rule that no judicial costs shall be levied.

art. 68 al. 3 LTF

Cited in the dispositive to rule that no legal costs shall be awarded.

art. 71 LTF

Cited as the provision allowing the application of Art. 73 PCF in the context of the appeal.

art. 73 PCF

Cited in conjunction with Art. 71 LTF as the basis for striking the case from the roll following the withdrawal of the appeal.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Bundesgericht

Tribunal fédéral

Tribunale federale

Tribunal federal

{T 0/2}

1B_495/2012

Ordonnance du 5 septembre 2012

Ire Cour de droit public

Composition

M. le Juge fédéral Fonjallaz, Président.

Greffier: M. Parmelin.

Participants à la procédure

X.________,

représentée par Me Nader Ghosn, avocat,

recourante,

contre

Ministère public central du canton de Vaud.

Objet

détention provisoire,

recours contre l'arrêt de la Chambre des recours pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 26 juillet 2012.

Vu:

l'enquête pénale instruite par le Ministère public de l'arrondissement de La Côte contre X.________ pour dommages à la propriété, violation de domicile et vol,

l'ordonnance du Tribunal des mesures de contrainte du canton de Vaud du 11 juillet 2012 qui prolonge la détention provisoire de X.________ ordonnée le 14 juin 2012 pour une durée maximale de deux mois,

l'arrêt de la Chambre des recours pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud du 26 juillet 2012 qui confirme cette décision sur recours de la prévenue,

le recours en matière pénale déposé le 30 août 2012 contre cet arrêt par X.________,

la lettre du 4 septembre 2012 par laquelle le conseil de la recourante informe le Tribunal fédéral que sa cliente a été libérée le 31 août 2012 et qu'il retire le recours,

Considérant:

qu'il sied de prendre acte du retrait du recours et de rayer la cause du rôle ( art. 73 PCF par renvoi de l' art. 71 LTF ; art. 32 al. 2 LTF ),

que celui qui retire un recours doit, en principe, être considéré comme une partie succombante, astreinte au paiement des frais de justice encourus jusque-là (ordonnance 9C_112/2009 du 6 juillet 2010; cf. art. 428 al. 1 CPP ),

que, compte tenu des circonstances et de l'objet de la contestation, il y a cependant lieu de statuer sans frais judiciaires, ni dépens (art. 66 al. 2 et 68 al. 3 LTF);

Par ces motifs, le Président ordonne:

1. La cause est rayée du rôle par suite de retrait du recours.

2. Il n'est pas perçu de frais judiciaires ni alloué de dépens.

3. La présente ordonnance est communiquée au mandataire de la recourante ainsi qu'au Ministère public central et à la Chambre des recours pénale du Tribunal cantonal du canton de Vaud.

Lausanne, le 5 septembre 2012

Au nom de la Ire Cour de droit public

du Tribunal fédéral suisse

Le Président: Fonjallaz

Le Greffier: Parmelin