Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 11/14, 6 B 11/14 (6 C 39/14) Generato dall'IA

Scope of judicial review of telecom regulator's discretion in calculating efficient cost hourly rates under TKG

Numero d'incarto 6 B 11/14, 6 B 11/14 (6 C 39/14)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court granted the complaint against the non-admission of an appeal and referred the case to the Senate for substantive judgment, thereby advancing the proceedings. The dispute concerns telecommunications regulation, specifically whether the national telecommunications agency possesses a margin of discretion when determining hourly rates for efficient cost estimation under specific provisions of the Telecommunications Act. The decisive legal basis includes § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO regarding the fundamental significance of the legal question, and § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 TKG and § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG (as amended in 2012) governing the agency's cost-calculation duties and the scope of judicial review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Scope of judicial review of telecom regulator's discretion in calculating efficient cost hourly rates under TKG: The dispute concerns telecommunications regulation, specifically whether the national telecommunications agency possesses a margin of discretion when determining hourly rates for efficient cost estimation under specific provisions of the Telecommunications Act. The decisive legal basis includes § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO regarding the fundamental significance of the legal question, and § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 TKG and § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG (as amended in 2012) governing the agency's cost-calculation duties and the scope of judicial review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
potere d'apprezzamento del giudice spese di procedura potere di cognizione valore litigioso base di calcolo reclamo amministrativo

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Main ground for allowing the admission of the appeal to the revision instance due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 14/14, 6 B 14/14 (6 C 42/14)
Scope of judicial review over regulatory agency discretion in calculating efficient hourly rates for one-time telecommunications fees under the TKG
6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14)
Telecommunications regulation: judicial review standards for the agency's discretion in calculating efficient service costs under § 31, 32 TKG
6 C 44/14
Telecommunications fee approval: scope of judicial review over regulator's determination of efficient hourly labor rates under § 31 TKG
6 C 41/14
Extent of judicial review of regulatory authority's efficiency assessment of hour rates in telecom fee approvals
6 B 16/14, 6 B 16/14 (6 C 44/14)
Telecommunications regulation: extent of agency discretion in determining efficient cost recovery hourly rates under §§ 31, 32 TKG and standards for judicial review

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Main ground for allowing the admission of the appeal to the revision instance due to the fundamental significance of the legal question.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the determination of the value in dispute for the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Procedural basis cited for the provisional determination of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Telekommunikation; Entgeltregulierung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und ggf. inwieweit das Telekommunikationsgesetz der Bundesnetzagentur bei der Ermittlung der Kosten der effizienten Leistungsbereitstellung nach § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 22. Juni 2004 (TKG) bzw. nach § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG in der Fassung des Gesetzes vom 3. Mai 2012 (BGBl I S. 958) in Bezug auf die Stundensätze, die der Ermittlung von (Einmal-)Entgelten zugrunde liegen, einen Beurteilungsspielraum einräumt und nach welchen Maßstäben insoweit die gerichtliche Kontrolle erfolgt.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.