Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 13/14, 6 B 13/14 (6 C 41/14) Generato dall'IA

Discretionary assessment in determining efficient service provision costs under the Telecommunications Act

Numero d'incarto 6 B 13/14, 6 B 13/14 (6 C 41/14)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted the intervenor's complaint and admitted the appeal on points of law, thereby permitting the case to proceed to the merits in revision. The dispute concerns telecommunications regulation, specifically the Federal Network Agency's determination of costs for efficient service provision and the hourly rates underlying one-time charges. The court held that the case possesses fundamental legal significance (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) because it requires clarification on whether and to what extent the Telecommunications Act (TKG) grants the regulatory authority a margin of discretion in these calculations and what judicial review standards apply. The decision is based on the provisions for efficient service provision costs under § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 and § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG; Discretionary assessment in determining efficient service provision costs under the Telecommunications Act: The dispute concerns telecommunications regulation, specifically the Federal Network Agency's determination of costs for efficient service provision and the hourly rates underlying one-time charges. The court held that the case possesses fundamental legal significance (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO) because it requires clarification on whether and to what extent the Telecommunications Act (TKG) grants the regulatory authority a margin of discretion in these calculations and what judicial review standards apply. The decision is based on the provisions for efficient service provision costs under § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 and § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
tassazione secondo il potere d'apprezzamento tassazione delle spese servizi di telecomunicazione diritto processuale prestazione facoltativa autorità amministrativa

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to fundamental legal significance.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14)
Telecommunications regulation: judicial review standards for the agency's discretion in calculating efficient service costs under § 31, 32 TKG
6 B 16/14, 6 B 16/14 (6 C 44/14)
Telecommunications regulation: extent of agency discretion in determining efficient cost recovery hourly rates under §§ 31, 32 TKG and standards for judicial review
6 B 14/14, 6 B 14/14 (6 C 42/14)
Scope of judicial review over regulatory agency discretion in calculating efficient hourly rates for one-time telecommunications fees under the TKG
6 C 39/14
Telecom tariff approval: No judicial discretion margin for regulator’s efficiency assessment of hourly cost rates
6 B 15/14, 6 B 15/14 (6 C 43/14)
Judicial review scope for railway regulatory agency’s determination of efficient service provision costs under German Telecommunications Act

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Basis for admitting the appeal on points of law due to fundamental legal significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Basis for the determination of the amount in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional determination of the amount in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Telekommunikation; Entgeltregulierung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und ggf. inwieweit das Telekommunikationsgesetz der Bundesnetzagentur bei der Ermittlung der Kosten der effizienten Leistungsbereitstellung nach § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 22. Juni 2004 (TKG) bzw. nach § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG in der Fassung des Gesetzes vom 3. Mai 2012 (BGBl I S. 958) in Bezug auf die Stundensätze, die der Ermittlung von (Einmal-)Entgelten zugrunde liegen, einen Beurteilungsspielraum einräumt und nach welchen Maßstäben insoweit die gerichtliche Kontrolle erfolgt.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.