Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
6 B 16/14, 6 B 16/14 (6 C 44/14) Generato dall'IA

Telecommunications regulation: extent of agency discretion in determining efficient cost recovery hourly rates under §§ 31, 32 TKG and standards for judicial review

Numero d'incarto 6 B 16/14, 6 B 16/14 (6 C 44/14)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court (BVerwG) granted leave to appeal (Revisionszulassung) in favor of the co-intervenor, overturning the lower instance's refusal and remanding the case for review on the merits. The dispute concerned telecommunications regulation, specifically the challenge against the Federal Network Agency's methodology for determining the costs of efficient service availability, including the relevant hourly rates used to calculate one-time fees. The court found the matter to be of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, establishing the need to clarify whether and to what extent the Telecommunications Act (TKG), particularly §§ 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 and 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 (2012 version), grants the agency a margin of discretion (Beurteilungsspielraum) in setting these hourly rates and what standards apply for judicial review of such regulatory decisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG, § 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG; Telecommunications regulation: extent of agency discretion in determining efficient cost recovery hourly rates under §§ 31, 32 TKG and standards for judicial review: The dispute concerned telecommunications regulation, specifically the challenge against the Federal Network Agency's methodology for determining the costs of efficient service availability, including the relevant hourly rates used to calculate one-time fees. The court found the matter to be of fundamental legal significance under § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, establishing the need to clarify whether and to what extent the Telecommunications Act (TKG), particularly §§ 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 and 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 (2012 version), grants the agency a margin of discretion (Beurteilungsspielraum) in setting these hourly rates and what standards apply for judicial review of such regulatory decisions.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
potere di apprezzamento amministrativo recupero dei costi valore litigioso spese legali sindacato giurisdizionale servizi di telecomunicazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Ground for granting leave to appeal due to the case having fundamental significance.
§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG
Procedural rule applied for setting the value in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.
§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG
Basis for the provisional setting of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.
§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG
Basis for setting the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.
Generato dall'IA
6 B 12/14, 6 B 12/14 (6 C 40/14)
Telecommunications regulation: judicial review standards for the agency's discretion in calculating efficient service costs under § 31, 32 TKG
6 B 14/14, 6 B 14/14 (6 C 42/14)
Scope of judicial review over regulatory agency discretion in calculating efficient hourly rates for one-time telecommunications fees under the TKG
6 B 11/14, 6 B 11/14 (6 C 39/14)
Scope of judicial review of telecom regulator's discretion in calculating efficient cost hourly rates under TKG
6 C 41/14
Extent of judicial review of regulatory authority's efficiency assessment of hour rates in telecom fee approvals
6 B 13/14, 6 B 13/14 (6 C 41/14)
Discretionary assessment in determining efficient service provision costs under the Telecommunications Act

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO

Ground for granting leave to appeal due to the case having fundamental significance.

§ 47 Abs. 1 und 3 GKG

Basis for setting the value in dispute for the complaint proceedings.

§ 52 Abs. 1 GKG

Procedural rule applied for setting the value in dispute in both the complaint and revision proceedings.

§ 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG

Basis for the provisional setting of the value in dispute for the revision proceedings.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Telekommunikation; Entgeltregulierung

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde der Beigeladenen gegen die Nichtzulassung der Revision ist begründet. Die Rechtssache hat die geltend gemachte grundsätzliche Bedeutung (§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO). Sie kann zur Klärung der Frage beitragen, ob und ggf. inwieweit das Telekommunikationsgesetz der Bundesnetzagentur bei der Ermittlung der Kosten der effizienten Leistungsbereitstellung nach § 31 Abs. 2 Satz 1 des Telekommunikationsgesetzes vom 22. Juni 2004 (TKG) bzw. nach § 32 Abs. 1 Satz 1 TKG in der Fassung des Gesetzes vom 3. Mai 2012 (BGBl I S. 958) in Bezug auf die Stundensätze, die der Ermittlung von (Einmal-)Entgelten zugrunde liegen, einen Beurteilungsspielraum einräumt und nach welchen Maßstäben insoweit die gerichtliche Kontrolle erfolgt.

Die Streitwertfestsetzung für das Beschwerdeverfahren folgt aus § 47 Abs. 1 und 3, § 52 Abs. 1 GKG; die vorläufige Streitwertfestsetzung für das Revisionsverfahren beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1, § 52 Abs. 1, § 63 Abs. 1 Satz 1 GKG.