Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
1 B 7/14, 1 B 7/14 (1 C 22/14) Generato dall'IA

Requirements for "lawful residence" to acquire permanent residence rights under § 4a Freedom of Movement Act where the citizen’s state of origin was already an EU member state during the prior period of residence

Numero d'incarto 1 B 7/14, 1 B 7/14 (1 C 22/14)
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Germania (DE)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Federal Administrative Court admitted the defendant's appeal for leave to appeal, allowing the case to proceed to full review and effectively favoring the defendant at the preliminary stage. The dispute concerns the requirements for establishing "lawful residence" to acquire permanent residence rights for EU citizens under § 4a of the Freedom of Movement Act, specifically in situations where the citizen’s state of origin was already an EU member state during the relevant prior period of residence. The court grounded its decision in § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, determining that the issue possesses fundamental legal significance requiring further clarification by the Senate, thereby rendering other asserted grounds for admission unnecessary.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO, § 63 Abs. 1 GKG; Requirements for "lawful residence" to acquire permanent residence rights under § 4a Freedom of Movement Act where the citizen’s state of origin was already an EU member state during the prior period of residence: Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an den für den Erwerb des Daueraufenthaltsrechts nach § 4a Abs. 1 FreizügG/EU erforderlichen "rechtmäßigen Aufenthalt" im Falle einer Unionsbürgerin zu stellen sind, deren Herkunftsstaat bereits während der maßgeblichen Voraufenthaltszeiten Mitgliedstaat der Union gewesen ist.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
diritto di soggiorno libertà di circolazione Stato d'origine statuto giuridico europeo diritto acquisito acquisto della cittadinanza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO
Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen.
§ 63 Abs. 1 GKG
Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.
Generato dall'IA
1 C 22/14
Acquisition of permanent residence right under EU freedom of movement requires five years of continuous fulfillment of substantive conditions, not merely continuous physical presence
1 C 15/09
Permanent residence for EU citizens without sufficient resources: requirement of Union-lawful residence under Directive 2004/38/EC
1 C 23/09
Family reunification residence permit: national visa requirement for Schengen entrants and EU free movement threshold for short-term stays
1 B 142/17
Reference date for determining loss of free movement rights and prerequisites for permanent residence under the EU Free Movement Act
10 C 8/12
Permanent residence under EU law: credit for pre-accession residence periods and requirement of continuous free movement entitlement

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Revisionszulassung; Anforderungen an den erforderlichen "rechtmäßigen Aufenthalt"

[GRUENDE]

Die Beschwerde des Beklagten ist zulässig und begründet.

Die Revision ist wegen grundsätzlicher Bedeutung der Rechtssache gemäß § 132 Abs. 2 Nr. 1 VwGO zuzulassen. Sie kann dem Senat Gelegenheit zur weiteren Klärung der Frage geben, welche Anforderungen an den für den Erwerb des Daueraufenthaltsrechts nach § 4a Abs. 1 FreizügG/EU erforderlichen "rechtmäßigen Aufenthalt" im Falle einer Unionsbürgerin zu stellen sind, deren Herkunftsstaat bereits während der maßgeblichen Voraufenthaltszeiten Mitgliedstaat der Union gewesen ist.

Auf die von der Beschwerde weiter geltend gemachten Zulassungsgründe kommt es danach nicht mehr an.

Die vorläufige Festsetzung des Streitwerts beruht auf § 47 Abs. 1 i.V.m. § 52 Abs. 2 und § 63 Abs. 1 GKG.