Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
VR.2017.00001 • VG ZH VR.2017.00001 Generato dall'IA

Partial Expropriation and Front Garden Land Compensation Dispute

Numero d'incarto VR.2017.00001
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The court addressed a formal partial expropriation involving the surrender of strip of land used as a paved forecourt, which was disputed as to whether it constituted "front garden land" warranting a reduced compensation rate. The court reasoned that because the surrendered area was a paved space not independently usable and neither a new building nor an extension on the remaining plot was feasible given the property's shape and existing structures, and the road widening caused no significant loss of privacy or increase in nuisance, the remainder of the property did not suffer a quantifiable reduction in value that required compensation under the relevant statute for a diminished remainder property; however, the disputed strip was ultimately deemed to be front garden land requiring compensation at a reduced rate, leading to the acceptance of the appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 26 Abs. II BV, § 13 Abs. 2 lit. a AbtrG, § 11 AbtrG, § 13 AbtrG, § 13 Abs. I AbtrG; Partial Expropriation and Front Garden Land Compensation Dispute: The court reasoned that because the surrendered area was a paved space not independently usable and neither a new building nor an extension on the remaining plot was feasible given the property's shape and existing structures, and the road widening caused no significant loss of privacy or increase in nuisance, the remainder of the property did not suffer a quantifiable reduction in value that required compensation under the relevant statute for a diminished remainder property; however, the disputed strip was ultimately deemed to be front garden land requiring compensation at a reduced rate, leading to the acceptance of the appeal.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
espropriazione parziale proprietà immobiliare frazionamento valore litigioso appuramento dell'elenco oneri indennità d'espropriazione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 26 Abs. II BV
Cited in the list of legal norms relevant to the decision, likely relating to property rights.
§ 13 Abs. 2 lit. a AbtrG
The court determined that the expropriated strip of land did not lead to a reduction in the value of the remaining property that would have to be compensated according to this article.
§ 11 AbtrG
This article concerns the basis for calculating the compensation for expropriated land, which was central to the dispute regarding the reduced compensation rate for front yard land.
§ 13 AbtrG
This article, which governs compensation, was cited in relation to the determination of the value reduction.
§ 13 Abs. I AbtrG
Cited in the list of legal norms relevant to the decision.
Generato dall'IA

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 13 Abs. 2 lit. a AbtrG

The court determined that the expropriated strip of land did not lead to a reduction in the value of the remaining property that would have to be compensated according to this article.

§ 11 AbtrG

This article concerns the basis for calculating the compensation for expropriated land, which was central to the dispute regarding the reduced compensation rate for front yard land.

§ 13 AbtrG

This article, which governs compensation, was cited in relation to the determination of the value reduction.

§ 13 Abs. I AbtrG

Cited in the list of legal norms relevant to the decision.

Art. 26 Abs. II BV

Cited in the list of legal norms relevant to the decision, likely relating to property rights.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2017.00001

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

Druckansicht

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2017.00001 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 12.04.2018 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · Formelle Teilenteignung · Formelle Teilenteignung: Entschädigung für Vorgartenland Rechtliche Grundlagen für die Entschädigung von enteignetem Vorgartenland (E. 2.2 ff.). Umstritten ist, ob es sich bei der enteigneten Fläche um Vorgartenland handelt und deshalb eine Reduktion vom Landwert vorzunehmen ist.

Bei der Abtretungsfläche handelt es sich um einen befestigten Vorplatz, der sich nicht selbständig nutzen lässt (E. 4.3). Ein strassenseitiger Neubau fällt aufgrund der Grundstücksform und der bestehenden Überbauung ausser Betracht (E. 4.4.1). Ob eine Erweiterung des bestehenden Gebäudes zulässig wäre, erscheint fraglich (E. 4.4.2). Die Verbreiterung des Strassenraums führt weder zu einem wahrnehmbaren Verlust an Privatsphäre noch zu nennenswerten Mehrimmissionen (E. 4.4.3). Die Abtretung führt damit nicht zu einem Minderwert des Restgrundstücks, der nach § 13 Abs. 2 lit. a AbtrG vergütet werden müsste (E. 4.4.4).

Beim streitbetroffenen Landstreifen handelt es sich um Vorgartenland, das zu einem reduzierten Ansatz zu entschädigen ist (E. 4.5 f.).

Gutheissung des Rekurses. · --- · Stichworte: · ABTRETUNGSENTSCHÄDIGUNG ENTEIGNUNG ENTEIGNUNGSENTSCHÄDIGUNG ENTSCHÄDIGUNG FORMELLE ENTEIGNUNG LANDWERT MINDERWERT SCHÄTZUNGSVERFAHREN VERKEHRSWERT VORGARTENLAND · Rechtsnormen: · § 11 AbtrG § 13 AbtrG § 13 Abs. I AbtrG Art. 26 Abs. II BV · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4