Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VR.2010.00003 • VG ZH VR.2010.00003 Generato dall'IA

Appeal Dismissed Over Land Expropriation Compensation and Traffic Noise

Numero d'incarto VR.2010.00003
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The administrative court dismissed an appeal regarding compensation for land expropriation and traffic noise after the appellant failed to submit a supplementary statement of appeal, thus deciding based on the existing case file. The court upheld the valuation commission's decision to award only 227 Fr./m2 for expropriated land, despite assessing the full building land value at 682 Fr./m2, because the expropriation involved only a narrow, inferior 1.5-meter strip within the building line, justifying a two-thirds reduction from the full land value as it represented only a small portion of the total property and would fetch little market price. Furthermore, the court agreed that no compensation was warranted for the formal expropriation of neighbor rights due to a planned expanded bus line because noise measurements confirmed that immission limit values would not be exceeded at the property.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 26 Abs. II BV, § 46 Abs. II AbtrG, § 46 AbtrG, § 13 Abs. I AbtrG; Appeal Dismissed Over Land Expropriation Compensation and Traffic Noise: The court upheld the valuation commission's decision to award only 227 Fr./m2 for expropriated land, despite assessing the full building land value at 682 Fr./m2, because the expropriation involved only a narrow, inferior 1.5-meter strip within the building line, justifying a two-thirds reduction from the full land value as it represented only a small portion of the total property and would fetch little market price. Furthermore, the court agreed that no compensation was warranted for the formal expropriation of neighbor rights due to a planned expanded bus line because noise measurements confirmed that immission limit values would not be exceeded at the property.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
fondo espropriato valore venale dell'immobile diritto di proprietà catasto dei rumori diritto alla riduzione del prezzo distrazione di valori patrimoniali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 26 Abs. II BV
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
§ 46 Abs. II AbtrG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
§ 46 AbtrG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
§ 13 Abs. I AbtrG
This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.
Generato dall'IA
VR.2016.00002
Property Owner Expropriation Compensation Appeal Dismissed Due to Non-Excessive Construction Vibration
VB.2016.00540
Property Owner Noise Barrier Appeal Dismissed
VB.2017.00372
Road Project Approval Upheld Despite Objections to Expropriation and Noise Pollution
VR.2013.00001
Expropriation Scope and Compensation Dispute

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
Art. 26 Abs. II BV

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

§ 46 Abs. II AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

§ 46 AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

§ 13 Abs. I AbtrG

This provision is cited in the list of legal norms associated with the final decision, indicating its substantive application.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2010.00003

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

[Druckansicht](/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe?OmnisPlatform=WINDOWS&WebServerUrl=&WebServerScript=/cgi-bin/nph-omniscgi.exe&OmnisLibrary=JURISWEB&OmnisClass=rtFindinfoWebHtmlService&OmnisServer=JURISWEB,127.0.0.1:7000&Parametername=WWW&Schema=ZH_VG_WEB&Source=&Aufruf=getDocument&cSprache=GER&nF30_KEY=210241&W10_KEY=13317115&nTrefferzeile=1&Template=standard/results/printviewdocument.fiw)

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2010.00003 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 25.11.2010 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · Landabtretung · Entschädigung für Landabtretung und wegen Verkehrslärm. Das Verwaltungsgericht entscheidet androhungsgemäss aufgrund der Akten, nachdem der Rekurrent innert Frist keine ergänzende Rekursbegründung eingereicht hat (E. 1.2). Dass die Schätzungskommission den Baulandwert auf 682 Fr./m2 schätzte und die Abtretungsentschädigung auf 227 Fr./m2 festsetzte, ist nicht zu beanstanden:

Die Enteignung betrifft lediglich einen 1,5 Meter breiten, minderwertigen Landstreifen im Baulinienbereich, der auf dem Markt kaum einen Preis erzielen könnte und der nur einen geringen Teil des Gesamtgrundstücks des Rekurrenten ausmacht; dies rechtfertigt einen Einschlag auf den Baulandwert um zwei Drittel (E. 2). Ebenfalls zu Recht verneinte die Schätzungskommission einen Entschädigungsanspruch wegen formeller Enteignung von Nachbarrechten aufgrund der geplanten Durchfahrt einer erweiterten Buslinie, da die Immissionsgrenzwerte im Bereich der Liegenschaft des Rekurrenten gemäss einem Lärmgutachten nicht überschritten werden (E. 3).

Rekursabweisung (E. 4). · --- · Stichworte: · ABTRETUNG BAULANDPREISE BUSLINIEN EINSCHLAG ENTEIGNUNG ENTSCHÄDIGUNG FORMELLE ENTEIGNUNG FRIST/-EN IMMISSIONSGRENZWERT LANDABTRETUNG LÄRM MINDERWERT STREITWERT VERKEHRSIMMISSION VERKEHRSWERT VORGARTENLAND · Rechtsnormen: · § 13 Abs. I AbtrG § 46 AbtrG § 46 Abs. II AbtrG Art. 26 Abs. II BV · Publikationen: · - keine - · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 4