Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VR.2005.00003 • VG ZH VR.2005.00003 Generato dall'IA

Stream Expansion Land Compensation Appeal

Numero d'incarto VR.2005.00003
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Svizzera · Canton Zurigo (CH-ZH)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Archivio Entscheidsuche Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The case concerned an appeal regarding compensation due for land cession related to the expansion of a stream in a municipality. The court determined that it had jurisdiction, that the relevant compensation should be based on market value, and that the calculation of lost value for partial expropriations, specifically involving front yard land, required an assessment, ultimately employing an average calculation linked to a comparison method. The court found that the appellant's arguments did not demonstrate that the chosen estimation method was unlawful, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

§ 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG; Stream Expansion Land Compensation Appeal: The court determined that it had jurisdiction, that the relevant compensation should be based on market value, and that the calculation of lost value for partial expropriations, specifically involving front yard land, required an assessment, ultimately employing an average calculation linked to a comparison method. The court found that the appellant's arguments did not demonstrate that the chosen estimation method was unlawful, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
indennità d'espropriazione diritto fondiario canone d'acqua tassazione d'ufficio riscatto di un diritto reale limitato terreno comunale

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
§ 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG
This provision is cited in the legal norms section, but since the final orders (dispositive) are not provided in the text excerpt, the primary ground for the final decision cannot be definitively identified based on the instruction to only use provisions explicitly cited in the dispositive orders. If this provision were the basis for the final ruling (e.g., allowing or dismissing the appeal regarding the compensation), it would be listed first. Given the excerpt ends before the numbered orders, and this is the only substantive law mentioned near the title/summary, it is tentatively included as the likely basis for the merits decision ('Abweisung der Rekurse').
Generato dall'IA
VR.2012.00003
Land Cession, Sidewalk Contribution, and Compensation Estimation Dispute
VB.2012.00298
Appeal Regarding Stream Relocation and Building Permit Coordination
VR.2024.00003
Expropriation Compensation Valuation Dispute on Developed Land
VR.2000.00005
Expropriation Compensation Valuation and Jurisdiction on Appeal

Questioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator

Generato dall'IA
§ 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG

This provision is cited in the legal norms section, but since the final orders (dispositive) are not provided in the text excerpt, the primary ground for the final decision cannot be definitively identified based on the instruction to only use provisions explicitly cited in the dispositive orders. If this provision were the basis for the final ruling (e.g., allowing or dismissing the appeal regarding the compensation), it would be listed first. Given the excerpt ends before the numbered orders, and this is the only substantive law mentioned near the title/summary, it is tentatively included as the likely basis for the merits decision ('Abweisung der Rekurse').

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Verwaltungsgericht des Kantons Zürich: VR.2005.00003

--- · --- · --- · --- · --- · [Standard Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/standard.htm) · [Erweiterte Suche](/findinfo/xhtmltemplates/advanced.htm) · [Hilfe](/findinfo/help/index.htm)

Druckansicht

--- · --- · --- · Geschäftsnummer: · VR.2005.00003 · Entscheidart und -datum: · Endentscheid vom 07.04.2006 · Spruchkörper: · 3. Abteilung/3. Kammer · Weiterzug: · Dieser Entscheid ist rechtskräftig. · Rechtsgebiet: · Enteignungsrecht · Betreff: · Landabtretung · Entschädigung für den Ausbau des Chämtnerbachs in Wetzikon: Zuständigkeit des Verwaltungsgerichts und Verfahrensablauf (E.1). Für die Bestimmung der Entschädigung ist der Verkehrswert massgebend (E.2.1). Standpunkte der Parteien (E.2.2-2.4). Bei der Enteignung von Teilflächen, insbesondere von Vorgartenland, ist die Ermittlung der Verkehrswerteinbusse oft mit schwierigen Problemen verbunden.

Vorliegend gelangte die Durchschnittsberechnung verknüpft mit der Vergleichsmethode zur Anwendung (E.3.1). Was der Rekurrent dagegen vorbringt, vermag die gewählte Schätzungsmethode nicht als rechtswidrig darzutun (E.3.2). Abweisung der Rekurse (E.4). · --- · Stichworte: · ABTRETUNGSENTSCHÄDIGUNG FORMELLE ENTEIGNUNG VERGLEICHSMETHODE VERKEHRSWERT VORGARTENLAND · Rechtsnormen: · § 13 Abs. 1 AbtrG · Publikationen: · BEZ 2006 Nr. 35 S. 41 RB 2006 Nr. 118 · Gewichtung: (1 von hoher / 5 von geringer Bedeutung) · Gewichtung: 2