951.1
VRP
CH-SG
CH-SG
Art. 28 Loi sur la procédure administrative (VRP) - Révocation
Deuxième Partie : Procédure devant les autorités administratives
Art. 28 VRP · Révocation
1. Les actes administratifs peuvent être modifiés ou annulés par l'autorité qui les a émis ou par l'autorité de surveillance, si la révocation n'affecte pas les personnes concernées ou si elle est justifiée par d'importants intérêts publics.
2. Quiconque a subi un préjudice en raison de la révocation d'un acte administratif alors qu'il avait, de bonne foi, engagé des dépenses ou pris des mesures en se fiant à cet acte, a droit à une indemnité équitable, à condition qu'aucune faute ne lui soit imputable quant à la révocation. Ce droit à indemnisation est dirigé contre la collectivité dont l'organe a émis l'acte administratif révoqué.
3. Les actes administratifs en matière fiscale, qui ne peuvent être contestés par des voies de recours ordinaires ou qui ne le sont plus, ne peuvent pas être révoqués. Sont réservées les modifications de l'acte en cas de non-paiement fautif d'un impôt ou dans le cadre de procédures de réouverture selon les art. 81 et suivants de cette loi, ainsi que dans les procédures de révision selon l'art. 197 de la loi sur les impôts.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (51)
B.2024.166 · sg (Art. 28 VRP)
Campsite Demolition Order Challenge Based on Insufficient Legal Basis and Proportionality Review
The court found that the previous decision could not be upheld as the basis for revocation under this article was not sufficiently established, particularly regarding the proportionality assessment and compensation rights.
B.2023.248 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Revocation of COVID-19 Aid Due to Prohibited Dividend Payment
This article provides the basis for the administrative authority to amend or revoke the contested decisions regarding the granting of financial aid.
B.2024.132.B.2024.1 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Regarding Functional Authority to Revoke Construction Stop Order Pending Appeal
This article is cited in the reasoning section (E. 5.1) when discussing the competence for revocation, but the core decision (Order 3) is based on the finding in E. 5.4.3 that the revocation decision was flawed due to lack of functional jurisdiction, which itself is framed by the VRP provisions concerning appeals and competence. However, the main ground for setting aside the decision is derived from the overall analysis related to functional jurisdiction and the devolution effect, even if Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP is only explicitly used in the reasoning section to establish the general competence of the municipality (which the court then finds was overridden by the devolution effect, making the act voidable, not void).
23.1822 · sg (Art. 28 VRP)
Appeal Dismissed Over Revoked Building Permit Lacking Mandatory Water Protection Approval
Cited as the legal basis for the appeal being dismissed, as the review of the revocation decision was based on this article concerning administrative law appeals.
22.2539 · sg (Art. 28 VRP)
Appeal on Building Permit for Retail Shop Conversion in Protected Townscape
Cited in the reasoning concerning the potential revocation of the decision, though the final order relies on procedural violations that make the decision appealable.
B.2022.136 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Sewage Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Water Pollution
The court confirmed the previous decision regarding the revocation of the permit based on the possibility for the authority to change or revoke decisions under public interest.
B.2022.136 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Sewage Permit Revocation Upheld Due to Persistent Environmental Non-Compliance
This procedural rule allows the administrative authority to revoke permits, which is the core issue leading to the upheld decision on the permit revocation.
22.1631 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Road Plan Approval Overturned Due to Inadequate Sight Zones for Private Accesses
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the possibility of revoking permits for important public reasons, but not in the final orders.
21.4370 · sg (Art. 28 VRP)
Sewage Treatment Permit Revocation and Public Sewer Connection Mandate
The court confirmed the legal basis for the revocation (Widerruf) of the operating permit, citing the applicable criteria in the reasoning.
21.5496 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Scaffold Business Noise Restriction Appeal
Cited in reasoning sections regarding the withdrawal of building permits, used in the context of argument, not in the final order.
21.9043 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Building Right Holder v. Construction Permit Notification Requirements
Cited alongside Art. 159 PBG when rejecting the request for precautionary measures, though not strictly part of the final operative text for the rejection of the precautionary measures (it was cited in the appellant's motion, but the court ultimately rejected the motion based on the main ground).
21.5496 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Scaffolding Business Appeal Reinstatement Against Local Council Restrictions
This article is mentioned in the reasoning relating to the revocation of the prior building permit, which supports the argument regarding the weight of the private interest in prior review.
21.5496 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Scaffolding Company Noise/Dust Restrictions Reinstatement Appeal
Mentioned in the reasoning by the parties when arguing whether the prior decision could be revoked/amended, which formed part of the analysis leading to the decision on the suspensive effect.
ABV.2020.2 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Child Support Advance Payments: Calculation of Deductible Income and Commuting/Meal Expenses for Part-Time Work
Cited in the reasoning regarding the understanding that the new decision only regulates the legal relationship from June 2020 onwards, without revoking the prior decision for Jan-May 2020.
IV.2020.130 · sg (Art. 28 Abs. 1 VRP)
Appeal Regarding Midrange Speeding License Withdrawal Reduction
Cited in the reasoning concerning the conditions under which the administrative authority can revoke a decision.