Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
732.1 STRG CH-SG

Art. 77 Loi sur les routes (StrG) - Exécution

VI. Coûts - 2. Procédure de transfert des coûts
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (124 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 77 StrG - Exécution · Exécution

1. Dans la procédure de répartition des coûts, les coûts de construction sont répartis par l'établissement d'un périmètre.

2. La procédure de répartition des coûts est menée de manière appropriée pour

a) Les périmètres d'entretien des routes communales de troisième classe ;

b) Les contributions de la commune politique aux routes communales ;

c) La répartition du déficit passif d'une entreprise périmétrique, lorsque la commune politique prend en charge l'entretien de la route ;

d) Les contributions de construction ultérieures aux routes communales ;

e) Les contributions à la construction des routes cantonales pour les constructions et installations qui entraînent un trafic considérable.

3. La procédure de répartition des coûts peut être abandonnée si la prise en charge des coûts est régulée par contrat.

← Art. 76 StrG Loi sur les routes (StrG) - Champ d'application Art. 78 StrG →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)

II.3.2017.9 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 2 lit. a StrG)
Municipal Road Maintenance Contribution Adjustment
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the correct procedure for cost allocation in maintenance perimeters for third-class municipal roads, but not explicitly in the dispositive.
B.2017.24 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 2 lit. a in Verbindung mit Art. 78 Abs. 1 StrG)
Challenge to Local Road Maintenance Cost Allocation Based on Power Company Benefit Assessment
This provision set the legal basis for applying the cost allocation procedure for road maintenance perimeters to the individual special benefit principle.
B.2017.24 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 2 lit. a in Verbindung mit Art. 78 Abs. 1 StrG)
Municipal Road Maintenance Cost Allocation Based on Special Benefit Principle
This provision establishes the legal basis for applying the cost apportionment procedure for maintenance perimeters of third-class municipal roads based on special benefits, which is the core issue the court ruled upon in rejecting the appeal.
I.2.2018.12 · sg (Art. 77 ff. StrG (sGS 732.1))
Landowner Liability for Perimeter Contributions Based on Project Finality Date
This provision is mentioned in the introductory paragraph as the legal basis under which the matter is being judged, although the main substantive ground for the decision is derived from Art. 78 and Art. 82 StrG.
I.2.2018.12 · sg (Art. 77 ff. StrG (sGS 732.1))
Property Owners Challenge Road Contribution Assessment Based on Timing of Liability Accrual
The decision is based on the provisions of the Road Act (StrG) concerning perimeter contributions.
B.2015.268 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 1 StrG)
Property Owners' Appeal Dismissed in Road Contribution Dispute
Cited in the reasoning regarding the cost allocation procedure through the establishment of a perimeter.
B.2015.268 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 1 STRG)
Property Owners v. Special Assessment for Road Development
This article stipulates that construction costs are divided by establishing a perimeter, which is the basis for the contribution plan procedure.
B.2015.65 · sg (Art. 77 StrG)
Road Contribution Perimeter and Special Benefit Determination
Although cited in the reasoning as general context for cost allocation, it is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
B.2015.65 · sg (Art. 77 StrG)
Municipality Road Parcel Exclusion from Road Construction Contribution Perimeter
Cited in the reasoning regarding the allocation of construction costs through the establishment of a perimeter.
B.2011.130 · sg (Art. 77 Abs. 1 StrG)
Property Dual Street Access and Road Maintenance Obligation
Mentioned in the reasoning section to explain the cost allocation method (perimeter contribution), but the operative part (dispositive) does not explicitly cite it for the final order itself, other than referring to the costs in order 2, which is a consequence of the dismissal in order 1.
B.2011.130 · sg (Art. 77 StrG)
Commercial Property Maintenance Contribution Appeal
Cited regarding the division of costs through the establishment of a perimeter in the cost apportionment procedure.