381.1 SHG

CH-SG

Art. 21 Loi sur l'aide sociale (SHG) - c) Procédure

II. Aide sociale personnelle - 3. Aide sociale financière

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (91 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 21 SHG - c) Procédure · c) Procédure

1. La commune politique qui a accordé l'aide sociale financière ordonne le remboursement.

2. L'aide sociale financière accordée depuis plus de 15 ans ne peut être réclamée. Sont exclus

a) L'aide sociale financière sous forme de

1. Prêts ;

2. Avances selon l'art. 13 de cette loi ;

b) Obligations de remboursement selon l'art. 14 de cette loi.

← Art. 20 SHG - b) par les héritières ou héritiers de la personne assistée Loi sur l'aide sociale (SHG) - Champ d'application Art. 22 SHG - d) Ajournement et Remise →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (5)

B.2017.77 · sg (Art. 21 SHG)

Prescription Period for Repayment of Social Assistance Execution

The ruling confirms the partial acceptance of the appeal regarding the reimbursement amount, which is based on the material claim period regulated by this article.

B.2018.33 · sg (Art. 21 Abs. 2 SHG)

Social Assistance Reimbursement Time Limit Interpretation

This provision defines the scope of the 15-year limit for the recovery of financial social assistance, which was the main point of contention in the appeal.

B.2018.33 · sg (Art. 21 Abs. 2 SHG)

Social Assistance Reimbursement Temporal Scope

The court ruled on the interpretation and application of this article regarding the time limit for claiming repayment of social assistance.

III.2011.4 · sg (Art. 21 Abs. 2 SHG)

Administrative Appeals Commission Reimbursement Claim Subject to New Social Assistance Act Limitation Period

This article regarding the limitation period for repayment claims was used to determine that the claim was not time-barred.

III.2011.4 · sg (Art. 21 Abs. 2 SHG)

Repayment of Social Assistance Benefits Limited by Prescription and Financial Circumstances

This provision concerning the limitation period for reimbursement was cited in the reasoning concerning the main ground for the verdict (non-prescription of the debt).