801.110 KRVOOPTC

CH-GR

Art. 44 Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - Examen Préliminaire

Droit formel de la construction - Procédure d'autorisation de construire - Procédure ordinaire d'autorisation de construire

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (85 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 44 KRVO · Examen Préliminaire

1. L'autorité communale de construction examine les demandes de permis de construire et les demandes de permis de construire liées au plan d'aménagement local (BAB) qui lui parviennent pour en vérifier immédiatement la complétude et les soumet à un examen préliminaire matériel. Parallèlement, il est vérifié si le jalonnement du bâtiment est correctement positionné.

2. Pour les demandes incomplètes ainsi que pour les demandes présentant des défauts matériels évidents, l'autorité communale de construction ou l'organisme spécialisé fixe un délai approprié au demandeur, dans un délai de 20 jours suivant la réception, pour compléter ou améliorer la demande de permis de construire.

3. Si la demande n'est pas complétée ou améliorée dans le délai imparti, elle est considérée comme retirée.

← Art. 43 KRVO - Panneau de construction Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - Département compétent, Service spécialisé Art. 45 KRVO - Mise à disposition publique, Opposition →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (10)

PVG 2023 11 · gr (Art. 44 KRVO)

Building Permit Coordination with Geothermal Heat Pump Water Protection Permit

Cited in the reasoning to determine that the municipality incorrectly handled the building permit concerning coordination requirements for supplementary permits.

R 2020 39 · gr (Art. 44 Abs. 1 KRVO)

Glazing Installation on Terraces Barred by Prior Building Permit Decision

Cited in the reasoning regarding the mandatory preliminary assessment of building applications mentioned by the appellants.

R 2019 8 · gr (art. 44 cpv. 2 OPTC)

Owners v. Municipality Regarding Forest Zone Building Permit Denial

Cited as the procedural rule violated by the Municipality regarding the requirement to allow the applicants time to complete an incomplete building application.

R 2018 57 · gr (art. 44 cpv. 1 OPTC)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Three Single-Family Homes Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning regarding the preliminary inspection of building applications by the municipal building authority, including checking the markers.

R 2019 40 · gr (art. 44 OPTC cpv. 3)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Denial of Building Permit for Woodshed Conversion and Associated Fee

Provision stating that an application is considered withdrawn if not completed within the set deadline, which justifies the rejection of the request on formal grounds.

R 2017 40 · gr (Art. 44 KRVO)

Appeal Against Building Permit for Pumptrack in Public/Winter Sports Zone Upheld

Cited in the reasoning (Section 4.2) regarding the municipal authority's duty to check building applications for completeness, which informs the finding that the plans were incomplete.

R 2015 25 · gr (Art. 44 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Applicant v. Municipality Regarding FAR Calculation and Basement Fitness Room Exemption

Cited in the reasoning regarding the scope of the preliminary review procedure, which the appellant argued was insufficient for assessing potential use conversions.

R 2012 169 · gr (Art. 44 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Building Application Rejection Overturn and Remand

The court ruled that rejecting the permit due to lack of complete documents, after the applicant had submitted further documents within the deadline, violates this provision, which requires setting another reasonable deadline for completion or improvement.

R 2011 38 · gr (Art. 44 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Appeal Against Refusal to Rule on Retroactive Building Permit Application

This article was cited in the reasoning to explain the procedural options the authority had regarding incomplete applications, which justified the annulment of the non-entry decision.

R 2008 81 · gr (Art. 44 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Municipal Zoning Dispute Over Centralized Parking Access

Cited regarding the procedure to handle minor discrepancies in submitted plans instead of denying the permit.