801.110
KRVOOPTC
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 25 Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - 2. Exposition publique, opposition, promulgation
Planification locale - Procédure de contribution
Art. 25 KRVO - 2. Exposition publique, opposition, promulgation · 2. Exposition publique, opposition, promulgation
1. Le Conseil municipal transmet le projet de répartition des coûts aux redevables en les informant de la possibilité de consulter les documents de base.
2. Les redevables peuvent former une opposition écrite et motivée contre le projet de répartition des coûts auprès du Conseil municipal dans un délai de 30 jours. Si la répartition des coûts est modifiée en raison des oppositions, les parties concernées doivent avoir l'occasion de formuler une nouvelle opposition dans un délai de 30 jours.
3. À l'issue de la procédure d'affichage, le Conseil municipal décide de la répartition des coûts et notifie sa décision aux redevables. En même temps, les contributions sont mises en compte.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (8)
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 KRVO)
Challenge to Municipal Infrastructure Fees and Energy Efficiency Surcharge
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal period, but not explicitly used in the operative part (dispositive) to form the final order.
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 KRVO)
Constitutional Appeal Against Municipal Connection Fees and Development Contributions
Cited in reasoning concerning the appeal deadline, but not directly applied in the dispositive orders.
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 3 KRVO)
Constitutional Appeal Against Municipal Connection Fees and Development Contributions
Cited in reasoning concerning the procedure for cost distribution, but not directly applied in the dispositive orders.
PVG 2007 20 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 KRVO)
Financing Infrastructure Contributions: Initiation vs. Cost Apportionment
Cited to indicate that an objection mechanism is available against the draft cost distribution plan concerning the contribution zones.
A 2007 27 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 2 KRVO)
Property Owners' Challenge to Infrastructure Assessment Area Expansion Barred by Procedural Grounds
Cited as the provision governing the objection possibility before the Municipal Executive concerning the cost allocation among contributors in the second phase.
A 2007 7 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 KRVO)
Appeal Against Municipal Determination of Public Interest Share in Cul-de-Sac Renovation Costs
Cited in the reasoning to indicate the future opportunity for appellants to object to the cost distribution plan.
A 2005 10 · gr (Art. 25 Abs. 1 KRVO)
Property Owner v. Road Improvement Assessment Board
Cited in the reasoning to establish the legal requirement for publication of the initiation decision, though the partial non-compliance was deemed not to have caused a legally relevant disadvantage.
A 2005 10 · gr (Art. 25 und 26 KRVO)
Property Owner v. Road Improvement Assessment Board
Cited in the reasoning as the relevant procedural provisions against which the appellant's claims regarding prior hearing and notification were assessed.