801.110 KRVOOPTC

CH-GR

Art. 23 Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - 2. Opposition, Décision

**Planification locale - Procédure de contribution**

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (85 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 23 KRVO - 2. Opposition, Décision · 2. Opposition, Décision

1. Pendant la mise à l'enquête publique, il peut être formé opposition auprès du conseil municipal contre l'initiation prévue de la procédure, le périmètre de contribution envisagé ainsi que contre la répartition des intérêts publics et privés.

2. La mise à l'enquête publique doit être répétée si le périmètre de contribution envisagé est modifié en raison des oppositions. Si les modifications ne concernent que certains participants, ces derniers doivent avoir la possibilité de former opposition dans un délai de 30 jours au lieu de répéter la mise à l'enquête publique.

3. À l'issue de la procédure de mise à l'enquête, le conseil municipal adopte la décision d'initiation et la communique aux parties concernées et à d'éventuels opposants. Les objections contre la procédure de contribution elle-même, le périmètre de contribution et la répartition des intérêts publics et privés ne peuvent plus être soulevées au cours de la procédure ultérieure.

← Art. 22 KRVO Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - Département compétent, Service spécialisé Art. 24 KRVO →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (9)

A 2008 75 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Property Owners Appeal Road Improvement Cost Apportionment Due to Power Line Relocation

Cited in the reasoning (Erwägung 3) to explain the mandatory nature of filing objections against the initiation of the contribution procedure during the public display.

A 2008 17 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Consolidated Appeals on Municipal Road Renovation Fee Allocation

Cited in the reasoning as the procedural rule allowing objections against the contribution area definition during the public display period.

A 2007 37 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Municipal Road Renovation Contribution Procedure Challenge

The court found that the municipality's decision to approve the definitive cost distribution was premature, as this step belongs to the second phase regulated by Art. 24-26 KRVO, not the first phase where the municipality had already acted.

A 2007 37 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Property Owners Challenge Road Renovation Contribution Procedure and Cost Allocation

The court found that the municipality improperly merged the initiation and cost distribution phases, which contradicts the procedure set out in Art. 23 KRVO regarding the first phase of the contribution procedure.

A 2007 49 · gr (Art. 22 und 23 KRVO)

Property Owners Appeal Road Assessment Perimeter and Cost Share Percentage

Cited as the legal basis for the decision regarding the initiation of the procedure (Einleitungsbeschluss).

A 2007 49 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Property Owners Appeal Road Assessment Perimeter and Cost Share Percentage

Used to establish that objections against the scope of the contribution area and public interest share must be raised in the first phase (Einleitungsverfahren) through objection proceedings.

PVG 2007 20 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Financing Infrastructure Contributions: Initiation vs. Cost Apportionment

Cited to confirm the procedural step where objections against the determination of public and private interest must be raised during the public display phase.

A 2007 27 · gr (Art. 23 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Property Owners' Challenge to Infrastructure Assessment Area Expansion Barred by Procedural Grounds

Cited as the basis for making the administrative decision appealable to the administrative court after the objection procedure.

A 2007 7 · gr (Art. 23 KRVO)

Appeal Against Municipal Determination of Public Interest Share in Cul-de-Sac Renovation Costs

Cited in the reasoning to explain the procedural limits on which objections could be raised against the initial decision (though not explicitly in the final orders, the outcome rests on the procedural distinction it establishes, which dictates that the cost distribution is not yet challengeable).