801.110 KRVOOPTC

CH-GR

Art. 16 Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - Introduction

Planification locale - Procédure de plan de quartier

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (85 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 16 KRVO - Introduction · Introduction

1. Le conseil municipal annonce l'intention d'engager une planification de quartier, en indiquant l'objet de la planification et la réalisation éventuelle d'un remembrement ou d'une rectification des limites, dans l'organe de publication officiel de la commune. En même temps, il met à disposition du public, pendant 30 jours, le plan avec le périmètre prévu de la zone de planification à la mairie. Les parties concernées doivent être informées par écrit avant la mise à disposition.

2. Pendant la mise à disposition publique, un recours peut être déposé auprès du conseil municipal contre l'initiation prévue de la procédure et la délimitation de la zone de planification. Les mêmes conditions d'habilitation au recours s'appliquent que pour une plainte en matière de planification auprès du gouvernement. Les objections contre la procédure en elle-même et la zone de planification ne peuvent plus être soulevées dans le cadre de la procédure ultérieure.

3. La mise à disposition publique doit être répétée si la zone de planification prévue est modifiée en raison de recours. Si les modifications concernent uniquement certaines parties, celles-ci doivent se voir offrir la possibilité de faire opposition dans un délai de 30 jours, plutôt qu'une autre mise à disposition publique.

4. À la conclusion de la procédure de mise à disposition, le conseil municipal adopte la décision d'introduction, la communique aux parties et aux éventuels opposants, et en informe l'organe compétent.

← Art. 15 KRVO Ordonnance sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRVO) - Département compétent, Service spécialisé Art. 17 KRVO - Élaboration du plan de quartier →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (20)

VR3 2023 108 · gr (Art. 16 KRVO)

Municipal Green Zone Planning for Underground Parking Upheld Against Heritage Concerns

The court notes that in this phase of the proceedings (initiation of the 'Quartierplan'), only procedural objections and objections regarding the definition of the planning area can be raised, as stipulated by this article.

PVG 2021 20 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Administrative Cost Imposition on Unsuccessful Neighborhood Plan Objectors

Cited as the procedural basis for objectors whose costs were ruled upon in the dispositive.

PVG 2021 20 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 Satz 1 KRVO)

Administrative Cost Imposition on Unsuccessful Neighborhood Plan Objectors

Cited in connection with Art. 96 Abs. 2 KRG to specify which objectors may be charged costs (those filing an objection according to this provision).

R 2021 85 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 Satz 1 KRVO)

Municipal Cost Imposition in Neighborhood Plan Objection Proceedings

Cited in the reasoning to establish the context of the objection which led to the annulled cost order.

PVG 2020 21 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Municipality's Discretion in Choosing Infrastructure Regulation Procedure

Used to dismiss the challenge regarding the initiation of the planning procedure as time-barred.

R 2016 82 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Appeal Against Neighborhood Plan Initiation Due to Flawed Infrastructure Planning

Cited in the reasoning to explain that only objections concerning the procedure itself and the delimitation of the planning area could be raised at this stage.

R 2016 82 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Appeal Against Neighborhood Plan Initiation Due to Flawed Infrastructure Planning

Cited to determine that the decision under appeal was the only eligible object for the administrative court proceeding, as it was the decision regarding the initiation phase of the zoning plan.

R 2015 94 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Neighborhood Plan Revision and FAR Increase

Cited to confirm that the initiation decision was procedurally sound and subject to objection during the public display period.

R 2015 94 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Neighborhood Plan Revision and FAR Increase

The initiation of the revision was done under this provision, which was confirmed to be procedurally correct.

R 2015 51 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 KRVO)

Administrative Court Upholds Zoning Revision Based on Changed Parking Feasibility

Cited to confirm that the municipality correctly followed the procedural steps for initiating a zoning plan procedure, including public notice and consulting affected parties.

R 2015 51 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Administrative Court Upholds Zoning Revision Based on Changed Parking Feasibility

Cited to confirm that the municipality correctly ruled on the objections received regarding the initiation of the procedure.

R 2014 94 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 1 und 2 KRVO)

Administrative Court Upholds Neighborhood Development Plan Approval Over Access Road Dispute

Used to justify the inadmissibility of raising objections regarding the definition of the development area perimeter, as this should have been done during the initiation phase.

R 2012 61 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 2 KRVO)

Property Owners Challenge Mandatory Neighborhood Plan Initiation

Cited to explain why objections against the planning area boundaries cannot be raised at this stage of the appeal against the initiation decision (point 3.a).

R 2012 78 · gr (Art. 16 Abs. 4 KRVO)

Owner Lacks Standing to Appeal Zoning Cost Assessment After Payment Deferral

Cited in the reasoning regarding the municipality's decision to initiate the detailed planning procedure, but it is not explicitly used in the final orders (dispositive).

PVG 2011 17 · gr (Art. 16 KRVO)

Municipal Plan Revision Invalid Due to Lack of Preliminary Resolution

This article was referenced as detailing the initiation procedure that was allegedly omitted.