801.100
KRGLPTC
CH-GR
CH-GR
Art. 64 Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRG) - 3. Droits
Planification locale - Aménagement
Art. 64 KRG - 3. Droits · 3. Droits
1. Des redevances sont perçues pour couvrir les coûts liés à la construction, à l'exploitation, à l'entretien et au renouvellement des installations de fourniture et d'évacuation.
2. Les communes déterminent, par un arrêté communal, quelles redevances sont perçues. Elles fixent les catégories de personnes assujetties ainsi que les bases de calcul et les taux de redevance, et régissent la procédure d'évaluation et de perception des redevances.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (6)
A 2017 56 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Property Owner v. Municipality: Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies
Cited as the basis for the municipality's authority to issue the EGG regarding fees.
A 2012 29 · gr (Art. 64 Abs. 1 und 2 KRG)
Property Owner Challenge to Municipal Fixed Service Fees for Closed Commercial Property
Cited as the legal basis for the power of municipalities to levy usage and supply fees to cover costs.
PVG 2008 23 · gr (Art. 64 Abs. 1 E-KRG (heute: Art. 62 Abs. 1 KRG))
Development Contribution Calculation Based on Net Costs After Subsidies
Cited in the legislative materials to support the interpretation that the financial provisions apply generally to planning law development measures.
V 2007 4 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Constitutional Appeal Against Municipal Connection Fees and Development Contributions
Cited in reasoning regarding municipal competence for fee assessment, but not directly applied in the dispositive orders.
R 2005 75 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Petitioner v. Municipality Regarding Hotel-to-Residence Conversion Restriction
Although the text mentions the costs aspect in paragraph 3.c, the specific legal basis for ordering cost reimbursement is typically found in the LTF for federal court decisions, or cantonal procedural law for administrative court decisions. Given the context, the actual basis for the cost order is found in the following provisions.
R 2005 71 · gr (Art. 64 KRG)
Property Owner Challenge to Restrictive Municipal Land-Use Plan Upheld
This article is cited as the basis for granting legal aid to the appellant (though implicitly, as the dispositive only concerns costs and fees in this case, but the structure suggests procedural grounds are primary).