801.100 KRGLPTC

CH-GR

Art. 63 Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRG) - 2. Contributions

Planification locale - Aménagement

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (137 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 63 KRG - 2. Contributions · 2. Contributions

1. Des contributions sont perçues pour couvrir les coûts liés à la création, la modification et le renouvellement des infrastructures de viabilisation. Les coûts soumis à contribution incluent toutes les dépenses nécessaires à l'ouvrage public.

2. Le conseil municipal détermine la part des coûts à supporter par la commune (part des intérêts publics) et par l'ensemble des propriétaires fonciers (part des intérêts privés). En général, les critères suivants s'appliquent

1. Viabilisation grossière

a) Part municipale : 70 - 40 %

b) Part privée : 30 - 60 %

2. Viabilisation fine

a) Part municipale : 30 - 0 %

b) Part privée : 70 - 100 %

3. Pour la répartition de la part privée entre plusieurs participants, l'utilisation possible du terrain, en tenant compte d'autres avantages et inconvénients éventuels, sert de critère en règle générale.

4. Les participants peuvent être obligés de faire des paiements anticipés jusqu'à hauteur des parts de coûts prévues.

5. Les débiteurs des contributions sont les propriétaires fonciers inscrits au registre foncier au moment de l'exigibilité. En cas de copropriété, les copropriétaires, et en indivision, les indivisaires sont les débiteurs des contributions. Dans le cas de droits de superficie, le titulaire du droit de superficie est le débiteur des contributions.

6. Le gouvernement réglemente par arrêté la procédure de perception des contributions (procédures de contribution).

← Art. 62 KRG Loi sur l'aménagement du territoire du canton des Grisons (KRG) - Objet Art. 64 KRG - 3. Droits →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (51)

A 2024 14 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 lit. a KRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Road Renovation Contribution Assessment Inclusion

Cited to contextualize the percentage division of the public interest share, although this division was not disputed.

A 2024 14 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 Ziff. 1 lit. b KRG)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Road Renovation Contribution Assessment Inclusion

Cited to contextualize the percentage division of the private interest share, although this division was not disputed.

PVG 2021 12 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Municipality Road Fee Cost-Sharing Challenge

Provides guidelines for the distribution of costs between public and private interests in infrastructure projects, which were used to evaluate the proportionality of the cost allocation.

A 2020 40 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Road Renovation Special Assessment Challenge

The court confirmed the cost distribution between public (30%) and private (70%) interest as being within the statutory limits set by this article for minor improvements (Feinerschliessung).

A 2020 27 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality (Road Renovation Cost Allocation)

The court found that the municipality's initial 50% allocation for the public interest exceeded the lower bound of the guideline range (40% - 70%) for a major development, leading to the modification of the cost split.

A 2018 48 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Road Sanitation Cost Allocation

The court determined that the cost sharing of 50% public interest and 50% private interest for the road section was correct and fell within the statutory limits for major infrastructure (Groberschliessung).

R 2014 37 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 3 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Cost Distribution Appeal for Development Plan and Compensation Valuation

Cited as the basis for how the private share of costs and planning costs are distributed, considering property use and advantages/disadvantages.

R 2014 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 5 KRG)

Cost Allocation for Road Adjustment Based on Current Ownership

Cited as the decisive rule for determining the debtor of contributions, based on land register entry at the time of maturity, which formed the basis for overturning the cost allocation.

R 2014 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 5 KRG)

Municipality v. Property Owner Regarding Road Widening Cost Allocation Based on Timing of Liability Accrual

The court determined that the decisive factor for assigning cost liability is the entry in the land register at the time the contributions become due, superseding the specific rule in the QPV.

A 2014 3 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Street Renovation Contribution Percentage

The court used this provision to confirm that the 30% public interest share (ÖI) for fine development (Feinerschliessung) was correct.

R 2013 131 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 KRG)

Cost Allocation Dispute in Neighborhood Development Plan

Cited in the reasoning section in connection with Art. 54 KRG, but the application detail is not the core ground for the final order.

R 2012 129 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Infrastructure Cost Allocation Challenge Dismissed

This provision was used to classify the sewage pipeline as Feinerschliessung and uphold the 0% public interest rate.

R 2012 129 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 KRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality: Infrastructure Cost Allocation Challenge Dismissed

This provision, regarding the split between public and private interest for infrastructure facilities (specifically Feinerschliessung), was used to justify upholding the 50% public interest rate for the water pipeline.

V 2010 3 · gr (Art. 63 KRG)

Municipal Credit Approval Challenge Based on Alleged Voter Misinformation Regarding Special Assessments

The court referenced this article to support the finding that the information allegedly given to voters regarding potential future cost contributions was not factually incorrect.

PVG 2010 22 · gr (Art. 62 Abs. 2 in Verbindung mit Art. 63 Abs. 1 KRG)

Challenge to Cost Distribution in Infrastructure Project Upheld

Cited as the legal basis for levying contributions to cover the costs of creating, changing, and renewing development facilities.