Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
370.100 VRGLGA CH-GR

Art. 63 Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Admissibilité

Procédure devant la Cour supérieure - Recours administratif
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (98 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 63 VRG · Admissibilité

1. Le Tribunal supérieur juge en procédure contentieuse

a) des litiges constitutionnels et administratifs entre des corporations et établissements de droit public de même rang ;

b) des litiges résultant de contrats de droit public ;

c) * des demandes d'indemnisation en vertu de la loi sur la responsabilité de l'État, dans la mesure où aucune autre autorité n'est désignée ;

d) * des demandes d'indemnisation résultant d'actions légitimes de corporations et établissements de droit public, dans la mesure où une base légale existe et aucune autre autorité n'est désignée ;

e) * des demandes patrimoniales issues de la relation de service public, dans la mesure où aucune autre autorité n'est désignée ;

f) * des litiges constitutionnels et administratifs qui sont attribués au Tribunal supérieur pour jugement en vertu d'une disposition particulière ;

g) * des litiges impliquant les églises nationales reconnues ou leurs paroisses, dans la mesure où ils peuvent être contestés devant le Tribunal fédéral, ou qui sont attribués au Tribunal supérieur pour jugement par les églises nationales.

2. Il juge en tant que tribunal des assurances en procédure contentieuse

a) des litiges au sens de l'article 73 de la loi fédérale sur la prévoyance professionnelle vieillesse, survivants et invalides (LPP) ;

b) * des litiges au sens de l'article 85 de la loi sur la surveillance des assurances (LSA) et de l'article 7 du Code de procédure civile suisse.

← Art. 62 VRG Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Autorités cantonales Art. 64 VRG →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (58)

VR1 2024 24 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Employee v. Hospital Foundation: On-Call Compensation in Employer Housing
Cited implicitly as the basis for the court's jurisdiction to hear the case concerning a monetary claim from a public service relationship.
U 2024 5 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Former Employee v. Municipality Over Post-Termination Work Compensation
Cited to establish the court's subject-matter jurisdiction over the claim arising from a public employment relationship.
U 2023 57 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit e VRG)
Employment Termination Date Following Illness During Notice Period
Cited to confirm the jurisdiction of the Administrative Court for handling monetary claims arising from public service employment in the context of the plaintiff's combined appeal/claim.
PVG 2023 19 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Arbitration Clause Validity in Healthcare Service Agreement Challenging Administrative Jurisdiction
The arbitration clause was declared void because it contradicted the court's jurisdiction under this article for disputes arising from public law contracts.
U 2023 70 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Administrative Court Jurisdiction Over Home Care Contract Termination and Arbitration Clause Validity
This provision governs the jurisdiction for disputes arising from administrative contracts, which was the relevant path for the dispute once the court determined the administrative appeal was inadmissible.
S 2023 12 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)
Pension Contribution Dispute: Contractual Breach vs. Jurisdictional Error
This article was cited in the reasoning as the basis for the Administrative Court's jurisdiction over disputes under Art. 73 Abs. 1 BVG, which was the subject of the jurisdictional review.
S 2023 15 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 2 lit. a VRG)
Pension Asset Division Following Divorce
Cited in consideration 1 as a basis for the court's jurisdiction to conduct the division, which is exercised in the dispositive.
U 2022 88 · gr (art. 63 cpv. 1 lett. e LGA)
Employee v. Municipality re: Untimely Appeal of Contract Termination
Mentioned in the reasoning to establish the Court's jurisdiction over the legal action.
U 2019 33 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
Claim for Uncontracted Public Employment Services Dismissed
This article establishes the court's jurisdiction for adjudicating claims arising from public service employment relationships, which was considered for the case's subject matter.
U 2020 13 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))
Canton Liable for Bed Bug Extermination Costs in Asylum Housing Contract Dispute
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over compensation claims under state liability law, which justifies the judgment on the merits.
S 2019 136 · gr (art. 63 cpv. 2 lett. b LGA)
Insurance Coverage Termination for Concealed Work Capacity
Cited in establishing competence (not directly applied in the dispositive).
U 2017 61 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
State Liability Claim for Unregistered Building Restriction Dismissed
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over the state liability claim, which is relevant context but not explicitly in the dispositive orders. However, based on the strict rule to only include provisions cited in the dispositive, and since the dispositive only contains orders 1, 2, 3, and 4/5 which refer to the ruling, costs, compensation, and appeal instructions, this specific procedural article is excluded unless it appeared in the operative paragraphs 1-3.
U 2019 108 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. e VRG)
On-Call Response Time as Working Time
Cited in the reasoning to establish jurisdiction for the claim based on a property dispute arising from a public service relationship, which supported entering the claim.
R 2019 21 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. b VRG)
Municipality's Claim for Payment on Unwritten Public-Law Contract Dismissed Due to Lack of Written Form
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over disputes arising from public-law contracts, but is not in the dispositive, so it should be excluded based on the rules.
U 2017 73 · gr (Art. 63 Abs. 1 lit. c VRG)
Estate of Deceased v. Public Hospital Foundation (Medical Malpractice)
Determines the administrative court's jurisdiction (sachliche und funktionelle Zuständigkeit) to rule on compensation claims under the SHG in declaratory proceedings.