370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 56 Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Compétence de jugement

Procédure devant le Tribunal supérieur - Recours administratif - Procédure

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (98 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 56 VRG - Compétence de jugement · Compétence de jugement

1. La cour supérieure est, sous réserve de dispositions légales contraires, liée par les requêtes des parties.

2. Si la cour supérieure n'est pas liée par les requêtes des parties, elle peut modifier une décision au détriment de la partie requérante ou lui accorder plus que ce qu'elle a demandé. Dans ce cas, il convient de donner aux parties l'occasion de se prononcer ainsi que de retirer la plainte.

3. Si la cour supérieure annule la décision contestée, elle statue elle-même ou renvoie l'affaire pour une nouvelle décision.

← Art. 55 VRG - Modification par l'Instance Inférieure Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Autorités cantonales Art. 57 VRG - Admissibilité →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (57)

VR3 2021 35 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Alpine Hut Window Design Dispute and Restoration Order

Applied reformatorily to newly set the administrative fine (Busse) based on the court's assessment of the case.

U 2024 39 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 und Art. 73 Abs. 3 VRG)

Healthcare Institution v. Canton: Review of COVID-19 Patient Transfer Cost Coverage

Basis for remitting the matter to the opposing party to re-rule on the costs of the previous administrative appeal proceedings.

R 2023 38 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Challenger v. Neighborhood Plan Amendment (Solar Panel Color Restriction)

Applied by the court to decide the case itself (reformatory decision) after partial annulment of the contested decision.

R 2024 9 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appeal Against Municipality's Uniform Balcony Solar Installation Requirement

Cited to acknowledge the court's binding nature regarding the parties' requests, which determined the scope of the final orders.

R 2024 9 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Appeal Against Municipality's Uniform Balcony Solar Installation Requirement

Used to justify the court's decision to grant the building permit directly (reformatory decision).

R 2021 74 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Appeal Against Barn Rebuilding Permit Upheld Due to Expired Heritage Rights and Aesthetic Non-Compliance

Cited in the reasoning when discussing the admissibility of the alternative petition (Eventualbegehren).

R 2024 42 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Reapportionment of Procedural Costs Following Partial Success on Appeal

Cited as the basis for remitting the case to the Government for new determination of costs and compensation consequences of the prior administrative appeal proceeding PB _____.

U 2024 15 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 VRG)

Child Support Advance Termination Following Adoption Retroactivity Dispute

Applied to confirm that the court is bound by the applicant's requests, leading to the dismissal of the appeal.

U 2023 59 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 1 Abs. 2 i.V.m. Art. 7 ff. und Art. 39 Abs. 1 VRG sowie Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB i.V.m. Art. 38 VRG)

Road Surfacing Procurement Cancellation Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness and formal correctness of the appeal.

U 2022 27 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Afghan National v. Denial of Hardship Residence Permit on Integration Grounds

The court decided to settle the case itself (reformatorischer Entscheid) when granting the appeal, based on this provision.

U 2021 91 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Cantonal Department Settlement Agreements Transparency Delay Pending Federal Review

The court used this provision to justify amending the contested decision itself instead of remitting it for a new decision, for reasons of procedural economy.

R 2022 111 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Federal Supreme Court Remand on Cost Allocation Following Area Plan Overturn

Basis for remitting the matter concerning costs and compensation in the planning appeal procedure (PB Z.1._____) back to the Regierung.

R 2022 78 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Municipality v. Construction Company: Revision of Cost Allocation in Administrative Proceedings

Cited as the legal basis allowing the administrative court to decide reformatorily (decide itself) on the outstanding cost/compensation issues.

R 2022 79 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Municipality v. Administrative Court: Cost Reallocation on Federal Remand

Applied to justify the court's decision to rule directly on the merits of the costs instead of remitting the case to the municipality.

U 2022 65 · gr (Art. 56 Abs. 3 VRG)

Tax Administration Repayment Obligation vs. Appellant's Subsistence Minimum and Legitimate Expectation

The court decided to issue a reformative decision based on this article.