370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 40 Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Invitation à comparaître

Procédure devant la Cour Supérieure - Dispositions Générales - Prescriptions de Forme et Conduite de la Procédure

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (98 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 40 VRG · Invitation à comparaître

1. La juge d'instruction ou le juge d'instruction invite d'office ou sur demande les tiers, dont les intérêts dignes de protection sont affectés par la décision, à participer à la procédure.

2. Si la personne invitée participe à la procédure, elle dispose des mêmes droits que les parties principales. Elle peut également se voir imposer des frais.

3. Par l'invitation, la décision devient également contraignante pour les personnes invitées.

← Art. 39 VRG Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Autorités cantonales Art. 41 VRG - Audience de référence →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (51)

VR1 2024 92 · gr (Art. 40 VRG)

Municipality Violated Procurement Rules by Altering Price Evaluation in Zoning Contract Award

Cited in the reasoning section (E. D) for the decision to join D._____ AG as an interested party in the proceedings.

R 2024 2 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Applicant v. Municipality Regarding Building Permit Condition Imposed Due to Lack of Property Owner Consent

Applied to justify imposing costs on the participating intervener (B._____ GmbH) and to establish its right to party compensation.

U 2023 36 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Professor's Procedural Appeal Against Denial of Representation Authority Dismissed

This procedural article was cited in connection with granting party compensation to the intervening parties.

S 2021 63 · gr (Art. 40 VRG)

Appeal Dismissed: Cooperative Member Liable for Unpaid Social Security Contributions

Cited in conjunction with Art. 61 ATSG in the reasoning regarding the basis for admitting co-litigants (Beiladung) to the procedure.

R 2019 73 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Municipal Planning Approval Upheld with Partial Amendment to Cost Allocation

Basis for ordering the losing parties (Beschwerdeführerin 1, Beschwerdeführerinnen 2, Beschwerdeführer 3, Beschwerdeführer 4, and Beigeladene) to pay court costs.

R 2019 76 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Development Plan Approval Challenged Over Access Ramp and Cost Allocation

Cited as the basis for generally imposing court costs on the appellants.

V 2019 6 · gr (art. 40 cpv. 2 LGA)

Election Recount Dispute Over Ballot Validity

Used to justify charging procedural costs to the convened party who took full part in the proceedings.

S 2018 50 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 Satz 2 VRG)

Physician's Consultation Income Reclassified from Self-Employment to Employment for Social Security Purposes

Used to stipulate that costs can also be imposed on an involved third party (Beigeladene).

R 2019 5 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG e contrario)

Appeal Against Municipal Agricultural Land Lease Based on Factional Requirements

Used to justify not imposing costs on the intervenor B._____, as he did not participate in the proceedings.

R 2017 44 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Municipal Plan Revision Upheld Against View Preservation Challenge

The court determined that the interested party (B._____ AG) is entitled to compensation for out-of-court costs because it participated in the proceedings.

R 2017 45 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Zoning Revision Challenge Regarding Hotel and Clinic Development

Basis for granting the intervener (C._____ AG) the same rights as principal parties, relevant for awarding compensation.

R 2017 46 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Property Owner v. Municipal Zoning Revision (H._____ South)

Applied to determine the rights of the interested party (Beigeladene) to receive compensation.

R 2017 48 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 in Verbindung mit Art. 78 Abs. 1 VRG)

Cantonal Zoning Revision Conditions Upheld in H._____-hang Development Appeal

Basis for awarding party compensation to the interveners (Beigeladene) corresponding to their degree of success (4/5).

R 2017 50 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Appeal Against Partial Development Plan Revision for Health Hotel Dismissed

Used to grant the intervener (Beigeladene) the same rights as the main parties regarding costs.

R 2018 60 · gr (Art. 40 Abs. 2 VRG)

Property Owners v. Municipality Regarding Equestrian Zone Zoning Revision

Cited in the reasoning to justify granting party compensation to the joined party (Beigeladene).