370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 38 Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Écrits juridiques

Procédure devant la Cour supérieure - Dispositions générales - Prescriptions de forme et conduite de la procédure

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (98 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 38 VRG · Écrits juridiques

1. Les actes de procédure doivent être rédigés dans une langue officielle et doivent contenir une conclusion juridique, les faits pertinents et une motivation. Ils doivent être soumis avec les moyens de preuve disponibles et la décision attaquée. D'autres moyens de preuve doivent être précisément désignés.

2. Les actes de procédure en format papier doivent être signés et soumis en double exemplaire.

3. Si une soumission ne satisfait pas aux exigences légales, ou si elle est rédigée de manière inconvenante, illisible ou excessivement volumineuse, un délai raisonnable sera fixé pour corriger le défaut, avec la menace que l'on ne saisira pas la soumission si elle n'est pas corrigée.

← Art. 37 VRG Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Autorités cantonales Art. 38a VRG →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (322)

VR1 2025 18 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2, Art. 39 Abs. 1 lit. c und Art. 52 Abs. 1 VRG)

Municipal Traffic Restriction on Minor Access Route Upheld

Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.3) as the procedural rules confirming the appeal was timely and formally correct, which led to the decision to hear the case (entry into merits).

VR3 2024 81 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)

Building Permit Conditions for Window Replacement on Historic Building

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timely submission of the appeal.

VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 VRG)

Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence

Cited in the reasoning as the formal requirement that the submission failed to meet, leading to the non-admission in order 1.

VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 VRG)

Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence

Cited in the reasoning as the basis for setting a deadline for rectifying defects in the submission, leading to the non-admission in order 1.

VR2 2025 56 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)

Failure to Perfect Appeal Grounds and Procedural Diligence

Cited in the reasoning as the formal requirement that the initial submission failed to meet, leading to the non-admission in order 1.

VR3 2024 41 · gr (Art. 52 Abs. 1 und Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)

Cantonal Watercourse Zoning Revision Upheld Against Property Owner Objection

Cited in conjunction with Art. 102 KRG to confirm that the appeal was timely and admissible for a decision on the merits.

VR1 2025 41 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)

Appeal Rejection Upheld Due to Procedural Defects and Untimely Submission

The court confirmed that the appeal was filed within the formal and time limits based on this provision.

VR3 2024 89 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)

Appeal Against Dismissal of Objection to Building Permit for Garden Shed

Cited to confirm the appeal was submitted in the correct form.

VR3 2023 47 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)

Appeal Against Partial Revision of Local Development Plan for Hotel Resort Expansion

Cited regarding the formal requirements of the appeal (although this article appears in the reasoning on admissibility, it is not explicitly cited in the final orders 1-4).

VR1 2024 92 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)

Municipality Violated Procurement Rules by Altering Price Evaluation in Zoning Contract Award

Cited in the reasoning section (E. 1.3) in conjunction with Art. 56 Abs. 1 IVöB to confirm that the appeal was admissible as it was filed in a timely and formal manner.

VR1 2025 10 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 VRG)

Failure to Submit Formal Appeal for Contract Award Decision

The court applied the procedure outlined in this article by setting a deadline for the appellant to correct the deficiency.

VR1 2025 10 · gr (Art. 38 VRG)

Failure to Submit Formal Appeal for Contract Award Decision

The court did not enter a decision on the appeal because the submission did not meet the requirements of this article.

SV1 2024 1076 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)

Social Assistance Deduction for Misspent Inheritance Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to confirm that the appeal was filed within the correct time and form, which is a prerequisite for entering the merits.

U 2024 50 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 und 2 VRG)

Responsibility for Social Assistance Following Majority in Supported Housing for Vocational Training

Cited in the reasoning to confirm the timeliness of the appeal.

VR3 2022 19 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 1 VRG)

Farmer's Agricultural Enterprise Status Appeal Regarding Cantonal Minimum Land Requirement

Cited to confirm that the formal requirements for the appeal submission were met.