370.100 VRGLGA

CH-GR

Art. 18 Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Discipline procédurale

Principes généraux de la procédure - Droits et obligations des parties

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (98 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 18 VRG · Discipline procédurale

1. Les parties impliquées dans la procédure et leurs représentants doivent se comporter de manière décente envers les autorités et entre eux, et éviter toute procédure abusive et toute obstruction.

2. L'introduction ou la conduite d'une procédure de manière abusive, ainsi que la violation grave des règles de courtoisie envers les autorités et les autres parties impliquées, sont sanctionnées par l'autorité compétente pour statuer sur l'affaire, par un avertissement ou une amende pouvant aller jusqu'à 1000 francs.

← Art. 17 VRG Loi sur la justice administrative (VRG) - Autorités cantonales Art. 19 VRG →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (16)

U 2023 85 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appeal Regarding Landscape Protection Zone Exclusion Denied Due to Lack of Current Interest and Abusive Conduct

Cited in the reasoning (E. 7.1) in connection with the imposition of sanctions for inappropriate behavior, which is part of the court's overall disposition regarding conduct.

U 2023 85 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Appeal Regarding Landscape Protection Zone Exclusion Denied Due to Lack of Current Interest and Abusive Conduct

Cited in the reasoning (E. 7.1) regarding the potential penalty (Ordnungsbusse) for wilful litigation or gross breach of propriety, which justifies the court's reservation in E. 7.2.

U 2021 45 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Student Disciplinary Appeal Dismissed Due to Procedural Deficiencies and Representative Sanctions

The lawyer was sanctioned with an administrative fine for gross violation of propriety towards the authority, as established by this provision.

U 2020 2 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Social Assistance Appeal Dismissed with Reprimand for Excessive Filings

Used to issue a reprimand to the appellant for violating propriety towards the authorities.

U 2020 2 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 1 VRG)

Appellant v. Municipality Regarding Social Assistance Post-Move Expenses

Cited in the reasoning section preceding the final orders, relevant for the disciplinary action (Verweis) taken in order 5.

U 2020 2 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Appellant v. Municipality Regarding Social Assistance Post-Move Expenses

Basis for issuing a reprimand (Verweis) against the appellant in order 5 due to indecent behavior.

U 2020 6 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 1 VRG)

Association Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Defects and Unprofessional Conduct

Cited in the reasoning regarding the violation of the duty of proper conduct.

U 2020 6 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Association Appeal Dismissed for Procedural Defects and Unprofessional Conduct

Applied to penalize the appellant with a reprimand for gross violation of decorum.

U 2020 6 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 1 VRG)

Association v. Psychiatric Services (Procedural Non-Compliance)

Cited in the reasoning section concerning the requirement for parties to behave decently, justifying the sanction applied under Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG.

U 2020 6 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Association v. Psychiatric Services (Procedural Non-Compliance)

Used to justify the formal sanction (Verweis/reprimand) against C._____ due to gross violation of decency towards the authorities.

S 2017 95 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 VRG)

Claimant v. Insurer: Military Insurance Benefits for Hearing Impairment and Tinnitus

Cited in the reasoning when considering the possibility of sanctioning vexatious litigation.

A 2018 4 · gr (Art. 18 VRG)

Application for Recusal of Administrative Judge Dismissed

Cited in the reasoning regarding the need for proper conduct in proceedings, although no sanction was ultimately applied under this article.

U 2017 38 · gr (Art. 18 cpv. 2 LGA)

Lapse of Domicile Permit and Sanction for Offensive Conduct

Applied to impose a disciplinary fine on B._____ for serious offense against decency towards authorities.

U 2010 89 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 2 des kantonalen Verwaltungsrechtspflegegesetzes (VRG))

Appeal Against Heavy Goods Vehicle Restriction on Cantonal Road Upheld

Mentioned in the reasoning regarding the possibility of issuing a warning for exceeding decency limits in submissions, but not used in the final orders.

U 2008 95 · gr (Art. 18 des Gesetzes über die Verwaltungsrechtspflege (VRG; BR 370.100))

Appeal Regarding Retroactive Social Assistance, Offsetting of Advance Payments, and Mediator Appointment

The court explicitly pointed out this article regarding the appellant's conduct, although it abstained from imposing sanctions mentioned therein.