Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
173.000 GOGLOG CH-GR

Art. 18 Loi sur l'organisation judiciaire (GOG) - Information

### Dispositions Communes - Publicité
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (122 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 18 GOG · Information

1. Le Tribunal supérieur règle, par ordonnance, l'information du public par les autorités judiciaires.

2. Dans cette ordonnance, il peut régir l'admission ainsi que les droits et obligations des journalistes judiciaires et prévoir des sanctions en cas d'infraction.

← Art. 17 GOG Loi sur l'organisation judiciaire (GOG) - Objet Art. 19 GOG →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (638)

VR3 2025 72 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Appeal Dismissed for Non-Payment of Advance on Costs in Watercourse Regulation Dispute
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the judge's power to decide as a single judge when a remedy is manifestly inadmissible, which underlies the decision to declare the appeal inadmissible.
ZR2 2025 20 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG; CSC 173.000)
Debt Non-Existence Action Dismissed for Failure to Pay Procedural Costs
Cited as the legal basis for the decision being rendered by a single judge due to the evident lack of merit of the appeal.
SV1 2025 16 · gr (art. 61 LPGA i.u.all'art. 43 cpv. 3 lett. b LGA e all'art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Insurance Disability Pension Appeal Inadmissibility
Basis for deciding as a single judge because the application was manifestly inadmissible or unfounded.
KSK 2024 107 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Time-Barred Appeal of Provisional Rejection of Enforcement Opposition
Applied to justify the decision being made by a single judge because the appeal was manifestly inadmissible.
SK2 2024 61 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 des Gerichtsorganisationsgesetzes (GOG; BR 173.000))
Appeal of Non-Prosecution Decision Barred by *Ne Bis In Idem*
This article provided the basis for the chairman to decide the matter alone because the appeal was manifestly inadmissible or unfounded.
SK2 2024 67 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Deportation Detention Upheld Despite Pending Disability Appeal
The decision was rendered by a single judge based on this provision.
U 2023 50 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Municipality Refusal to Rule on Path Maintenance Upheld Due to Res Judicata and Failure to Pursue Substantive Claim
Cited alongside Art. 43 Abs. 3 VRG as the basis for the single judge deciding the case.
U 2023 85 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Appeal Regarding Landscape Protection Zone Exclusion Denied Due to Lack of Current Interest and Abusive Conduct
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1) alongside Art. 43 Abs. 3 VRG to establish the single-judge competence to rule on the manifestly inadmissible appeal, leading to the non-admission order (Order 1).
SK2 2024 65 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Weapons Act Violation Penalty Order Finality Appeal Dismissed
This article, regarding the single-judge competence of the Cantonal Court in specific cases, was cited as a basis for issuing the decision in single-judge competence.
KSK 2024 106 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Lack of Standing to Appeal Provisional Dismissal Order
The appeal was decided by a single judge because it was manifestly inadmissible.
KSK 2024 85 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG [CSC 173.000])
Enforcement Creditor v. Debtor (Heating Cost Adjustment Enforceability)
Cited as the legal basis for the President ruling as a single judge due to the obvious unfoundedness of the appeal.
KSK 2024 98 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Enforcement Officer Subsistence Minimum Determination Upheld Due to Lack of Documentary Proof for Vehicle Costs
Used to justify the decision being rendered by a single judge due to the manifestly unfounded nature of the appeal.
ZK2 2024 37 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Company Dissolution Overruled Due to New Domicile Registration
Applied to decide the appeal by a single judge because it was manifestly well-founded.
KSK 2024 93 · gr (art. 18 cpv. 3 LOG)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Unmotivated Briefing
The appeal was decided by a single judge because it was manifestly inadmissible.
ZK1 2024 194 · gr (Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Filing of Protection Authority Decision Challenge
Cited as the authority under which the decision was rendered by a single judge.