741.21 SSVOSROSSTR

CH

Art. 98 Ordonnance du 5 septembre 1979 sur la signalisation routière (OSR) - Réclames routières sur les autoroutes et les semi-autoroutes

OSR; Chapitre 13 Réclames routières

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (136 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 98 OSR · Réclames routières sur les autoroutes et les semi-autoroutes

Les réclames routières sont interdites aux abords des autoroutes et des semi-autoroutes.

Sont toutefois autorisées: a. une enseigne d’entreprise dans chaque sens de circulation par entreprise; b. des annonces axées sur l’éducation ou la prévention routières ou sur la gestion du trafic; la surface des indications éventuelles concernant le parrainage de l’annonce ne doit pas mesurer plus d’un dixième de celle du panneau.

Sont autorisées sur les installations annexes et les aires de repos: a. par station-service, une enseigne lumineuse d’entreprise sur le bâtiment et une sur le terre-plein entre la route nationale et l’installation annexe; b. par restaurant et par motel, une enseigne lumineuse d’entreprise sur le bâtiment, une sur son côté long et une son côté court; c. les réclames routières, pour autant qu’elles ne puissent pas être perçues par les conducteurs sur les voies de transit.

← Art. 97 OSR Ordonnance du 5 septembre 1979 sur la signalisation routière (OSR) - Contenu, abréviations et définitions Art. 99 OSR →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (8)

GE.2021.0224 · vd (Art. 98 OSR)

Municipal Refusal to Authorize Rooftop Advertisement Upheld Over Roadside Advertising Restrictions

The court confirmed the municipal decision rejecting the advertising permit based on the restriction concerning the number of company signs allowed.

GE.2019.0017 · vd (Art. 98 al. 1 et al. 2 let. a OSR)

Road Advertisement Near Motorway Visibility Violation

This provision regarding the prohibition of road advertising near motorways and the exception allowing one sign per direction of traffic per company was the substantive basis for rejecting the appeal and confirming the municipal decision.

GE.2014.0011 · vd (art. 98 al. 2 OSR)

Business Signage Permit Denial Upheld on Expressway Visibility Grounds

This provision was the main legal basis cited in the reasoning to justify the rejection of the appeal, as the requested second sign violated the limit of one sign per direction of traffic near highways.

GE.2011.0010 · vd (Art. 98 al. 2 OSR)

Company Advertising on Building Facades Near National Road

Used to partially grant the appeal by allowing signage on the south-west facade because the elements were not considered visible according to the established criteria.

GE.2011.0010 · vd (Art. 98 al. 2 OSR)

Company Advertising on Building Facades Near National Road

Used to reject the part of the appeal concerning the allowance of the 'smiley Lipo' on the north-west facade and the removal of flags, as flagpoles were deemed in contradiction with the limit of one sign per direction of traffic.

V 07 183 · lu (Art. 98 Abs. 1 und 2 SSV)

Municipal Order to Remove Field Advertising Upheld Due to Road Safety Regulations

The legal basis for denying permission for the advertising structure, as it constitutes foreign advertising in the area of a national road.

52.2005.163 · ti (art. 98 OSStr)

Hotel Signage Location and Traffic Safety Dispute

The appeal was rejected, confirming the denial of authorization based on the prohibition of third-party advertising outside localities.

52.2005.163 · ti (art. 98 OSStr)

Refusal of Authorization for Unlit Advertising Panel Outside Locality Due to Lack of Local Connection and Traffic Safety Concerns

The appeal was rejected based on the prohibition of third-party advertising outside localities stipulated in this article.