741.21
SSVOSROSSTR
CH
CH
Art. 96 Ordonnance du 5 septembre 1979 sur la signalisation routière (OSR) - Principes
OSR; Chapitre 13 Réclames routières
Art. 96 OSR · Principes
Sont interdites les réclames routières qui pourraient compromettre la sécurité routière, notamment si elles: a. rendent plus difficile la perception des autres usagers de la route, par exemple aux abords des passages pour piétons, des intersections ou des sorties; b. gênent ou mettent en danger les ayants droit sur les aires de circulation affectées aux piétons; c. peuvent être confondues avec des signaux ou des marques, ou d. réduisent l’efficacité des signaux ou des marques.
Sont toujours interdites les réclames routières: a. si elles sont placées dans le gabarit d’espace libre de la chaussée; b. sur la chaussée, sauf dans les zones piétonnes; c. dans des tunnels ainsi que dans des passages souterrains dépourvus de trottoirs; d. si elles contiennent des signaux ou des éléments indiquant une direction à suivre.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (45)
110 2025 1 · be (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. a SSV)
Municipal Permit Denial Overturned for Industrial Zone Billboards
Used to confirm that the billboards do not impede the recognition of other road users.
110 2025 1 · be (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. b SSV)
Municipal Permit Denial Overturned for Industrial Zone Billboards
Used to confirm that pedestrians on pedestrian areas are not obstructed or endangered.
110 2025 1 · be (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. c SSV)
Municipal Permit Denial Overturned for Industrial Zone Billboards
Used to confirm that there is no risk of confusion with signals or markings.
110 2025 1 · be (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. d SSV)
Municipal Permit Denial Overturned for Industrial Zone Billboards
Used to confirm that the effect of signals or markings is not diminished.
GE.2023.0141 · vd (art. 96 al. 1 OSR)
Municipality v. Advertising Sign Permit Denial (Road Safety)
This provision was the basis for the initial refusal, and the final order confirms the decision which was based on it, as the appeal challenging this refusal was rejected.
RRB.Nr.2022.000739 · ag (Art. 96 Abs. 1 SSV)
City Council v. Clear Channel UK Ltd.
The prohibition of road advertisements that could impair traffic safety, particularly near pedestrian crossings or junctions, was used as a basis for dismissing the appeal.
RDRM.2020.21 · sg (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. a SSV)
Cantonal Road Advertising Panel Installation Denial
Cited in the reasoning regarding specific impairments near pedestrian crossings, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
RDRM.2020.21 · sg (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. c SSV)
Cantonal Road Advertising Panel Installation Denial
Cited in the reasoning regarding similarity to signals, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
RDRM.2020.21 · sg (Art. 96 Abs. 1 Bst. d SSV)
Cantonal Road Advertising Panel Installation Denial
Cited in the reasoning regarding reduction of signal effectiveness, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
RDRM.2020.21 · sg (Art. 96 SSV)
Cantonal Road Advertising Panel Installation Denial
This article specifies prohibited street advertisements that impair traffic safety, particularly near pedestrian crossings and intersections, used to justify the rejection.
60/2016/21 · sh (Art. 96 Abs. 1 SSV)
Advertising Panel Permit Appeal: Traffic Safety and Aesthetic Compliance
This provision concerning traffic safety was assessed, but the court ultimately found no violation in the dispositive.
GE.2017.0204 · vd (Art. 96 al. 1 OSR)
LED Screen Advertising Permit Refusal Upheld on Road Safety Grounds
Cited as a legal provision supporting the conclusion that the advertising devices could compromise road safety.
110 2017 161 · be (Art. 96 SSV)
Building Permit Denial Upheld Due to Traffic Safety Concerns
Cited in the reasoning leading to the dismissal of the appeal, as it specifies situations where road advertisements typically impair traffic safety.
VB.2014.00155 · zh (Art. 96 Abs. I SSV)
Revocation of Street Advertisement Permit Due to Inadequate Traffic Safety Assessment
This provision concerning road advertising was considered in the context of potential impairment of traffic safety.
GE.2014.0117 · vd (art. 96 al. 1 let. a et b OSR)
Advertising Company v. Municipality (Billboard Installation Safety)
The rejection of the appeal was based on the violation of road safety due to the billboard's location near a pedestrian crossing and intersection, as cited in the grounds for refusal.