700
RPGLATLPT
CH
CH
Art. 8 Loi fédérale du 22 juin 1979 sur l'aménagement du territoire (LAT) - Contenu minimal des plans directeurs
LAT; Titre 2 Mesures d’aménagement; Chapitre 1 Plans directeurs des cantons
Art. 8 LAT · Contenu minimal des plans directeurs
Tous les cantons établissent un plan directeur dans lequel ils précisent au moins: a. le cours que doit suivre l’aménagement de leur territoire; b. la façon de coordonner les activités qui ont des effets sur l’organisation du territoire, afin d’atteindre le développement souhaité; c. une liste de priorités et les moyens à mettre en œuvre.
Les projets qui ont des incidences importantes sur le territoire et l’environnement doivent avoir été prévus dans le plan directeur.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (26)
BRGE.III.Nr.0129.20 · zh (Art. 8 RPG)
Textile Cleaning Facility Permit Appeal Regarding Spatial Plan and Railway Proximity
Cited in the reasoning to define the content of master plans, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.
RRB.2025.000061 · ag (Art. 8 RPG)
Zoning Revision Upheld Despite Conflict with Cantonal Development Plan
Cited as the basis for cantonal spatial development plans.
VB.2023.00035 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. II RPG)
Gravel Pit Development Plan Upheld, Minor Regulations Amended
The court applied this provision when considering the requirements for the location of projects.
B.2023.8 · sg (Art. 8 Abs. 2 RPG)
Cantonal Government Responsible for Waste Planning; Private Operator Lacks Standing for Specific Site Mandate
This provision, cited in the introductory list, relates to the need for comprehensive assessment when selecting disposal sites, relevant to the planning duties discussed.
R 2021 87 · gr (Art. 8, 8a, 15 und 38a RPG)
Nature Protection Organization v. Cantonal Government (Land-Use Plan Revision)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the appellant's argument about oversized building zones and the circumvention of reduction duties.
602 2022 209 · fr (Art. 8 al. 1 let. c LAT)
Appeal Rejection Regarding Building Density Index and Development Zone Extension Based on Accessibility and Cantonal Boundaries
Cited in the reasoning regarding the purpose of the cantonal master plan, but not in the operative part.
VB.2020.00080 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. II RPG)
Cable Car Project Development Plan and Water Concession Appeal
Cited implicitly as part of the planning principles considered in the weighing of interests which determined the outcome.
A1 21 131 · vs (Art. 8 Abs. 2 RPG)
Administrative Appeal Regarding Mountain Bike Track Approval and Expropriation
Cited in the context of projects with significant impacts requiring a land-use plan basis, but the court found this threshold not met.
90.2020.58 · ti (art. 8 LPT)
Taxpayers v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendment Validity)
Cited in conjunction with Art. 38a LPT as a requirement for the adaptation of cantonal master plans, which justifies the violation found regarding the new building area.
VB.2020.00876 · zh (Art. 8 Abs. 1 RPG)
Zoning Ordinance Prohibition of Off-Airport Parking Upheld
This provision is cited as a basis for the requirement of a master plan, which is relevant for coordinating significant spatial planning needs and environmental impacts.
TVR.2020.Nr.14 · tg (Art. 8 a RPG)
Application of Newly Approved Regional Plan to Pending Special Use Permit Review
Cited in connection with the analysis justifying the immediate application of the new cantonal master plan (KRP 2017) due to alignment with principles like high-quality inward development.
CDP.2018.359 · ne (Art. 8 LAT)
Property Co-owners v. Local Development Plan Reclassification Based on Heritage Protection
Cited in the context of aligning local planning with cantonal master plan guidelines.
AC.2017.0028 · vd (art. 8 LAT)
Building Permit Denial for Mixed-Use Facility in Artisan Zone
Cited in reasoning regarding cantonal master plans, but not used as a ground for the final order.
602 2015 114 · fr (Art. 8 ff. RPG)
Municipality v. Cantonal Directorate Regarding Local Development Plan Revision
Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for each canton to create a development plan.
ADM 2016 15 · ju (art. 8 al. 2 LAT)
Quarry Approval Overturned Due to Outdated Master Plan
Cited as the basis for requiring projects with significant impacts on territory and environment to be foreseen in the master plan.