613.2
FILAGPFCCLPFC
CH
CH
Art. 2 Loi fédérale du 3 octobre 2003 sur la péréquation financière et la compensation des charges (PFCC) - Buts
PFCC
Art. 2 PFCC · Buts
La péréquation financière vise à: a. renforcer l’autonomie financière des cantons; b. réduire les disparités entre cantons en ce qui concerne la capacité financière et la charge fiscale; c. maintenir la compétitivité fiscale des cantons au niveau national et international; d. garantir aux cantons une dotation minimale en ressources financières; e. compenser les charges excessives des cantons dues à des facteurs géo-topographiques ou socio-démographiques; f. garantir une compensation des charges équitable entre les cantons.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (7)
A/3593/2020 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. c de la loi sur les prestations fédérales complémentaires à l’assurance-vieillesse et survivants et à l’assurance-invalidité (LPFC))
Claimant v. Social Benefits Service (Dental Implant Coverage Dispute)
Cited as the delegation of competence to the State Council for determining reimbursable health and disability costs under the LPC.
A/607/2019 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. c de la loi sur les prestations fédérales complémentaires à l’assurance-vieillesse et survivants et à l’assurance-invalidité du 14 octobre 1965 (LPFC – J 4 20))
Appeal of Denial of Reimbursement for Medically Necessary Diet Expenses
Cited as the legal basis for the State Council to determine reimbursable illness and disability costs.
A/1996/2018 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. c LPFC)
Dental Implant Reimbursement Limitation Appeal
Cited in the reasoning to establish the delegation of competence for determining reimbursable health/invalidity costs.
A/1863/2018 · ge (Art. 2 al. 1 let. c LPFC)
Orthodontic Coverage Denial Upheld Due to Failure to Meet Cantonal Criteria
Cited in the reasoning regarding the delegation of competence, but not in the final orders (dispositive). Excluded based on rules.
A/3631/2013 · ge (Art. 2 al. 1 let a et b LPFC)
Benefits Recipient Reimbursement Over Hospitalization Duration
The court referenced this article regarding the cantonal determination of the maximum daily rate and amounts for personal expenses in care facilities, which is contextually relevant to the tariff dispute.
A/2267/2010 · ge (art. 2 al. 1 let. c de la loi LPFC)
Disability Benefits Recipient v. Social Insurance Service (Dental Coverage)
Cited to establish the State Council's competence to define reimbursable costs based on federal law (Art. 14 LPC).
A/1140/2010 · ge (art. 2 al. 2 LPFC)
Beneficiary Appeal on Supplementary Pension Benefits Based on Joint Account Wealth
Cited in the reasoning (point 5a) detailing the specific cantonal adaptation regarding the fraction of net assets to be considered (one-eighth/one-fifth).