455
TSCHGLPALPAN
CH
CH
Art. 2 Loi fédérale du 16 décembre 2005 sur la protection des animaux (LPA) - Champ d’application
LPA; Chapitre 1 Généralités
Art. 2 LPA · Champ d’application
La présente loi s’applique aux vertébrés. Le Conseil fédéral détermine à quels invertébrés elle s’applique et dans quelle mesure. Il s’appuie à cet égard sur les résultats de la recherche scientifique menée sur les capacités sensitives de ces derniers.
Sont réservées la loi du 20 juin 1986 sur la chasse , la loi fédérale du 1 er juillet 1966 sur la protection de la nature et du paysage , la loi fédérale du 21 juin 1991 sur la pêche , la loi fédérale du 13 décembre 2002 sur la formation professionnelle ainsi que la loi du 1 er juillet 1966 sur les épizooties .
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (27)
A/1449/2020 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Associate Professor v. University Faculty Committee (Gender Discrimination in Promotion Appeal Nomination)
The court found that the LEg overrides the exclusion of LPA applicability for promotions stipulated in this article when discrimination is alleged.
A/2076/2021 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Appeal Inadmissible: Probationary Promotion Non-Confirmation Not Challengeable Administrative Act
The appeal was declared inadmissible because the provisions of the LPA are not applicable to promotion procedures.
A/1979/2010 · ge (Art. 2 let. d LPA)
Employee v. City Regarding Salary and Job Classification
Cited implicitly when noting that an appeal against the refusal of a promotion would be inadmissible because the LPA would be inapplicable in that context.
A/36/2000 · ge (art. 44 al. premier et 2 LPA)
Attorney Malpractice and Professional Misconduct Suspension
Cited in relation to the appellant having access to the case file, as part of the preliminary admissibility findings.
A/284/2025 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Refusal to Approve Municipal Police Nomination Not Subject to Full Judicial Review
The court declared the appeal inadmissible because the procedure falls under the exclusion from the application of the LPA rules regarding the initial creation of service relationships.
VB.2023.00580 · zh (Art. 2 TSchG)
Pony Owner Compliance Conditions Upheld
This provision was cited among others in the list of legal norms applicable to the case being decided.
A/1729/2024 · ge (art. 2 let. d LPA)
Employee Appeal Against Non-Confirmation of Promotion Denied Suspensive Effect
Cited in the reasoning regarding the inapplicability of LPA procedural rules to promotions.
A/2257/2021 · ge (art. 1 et 2 LPA)
Brazilian National's Residency Appeal Rejected on Hardship Grounds
Cited alongside Art. 60 and 62 to 65 LPA to declare the appeal admissible.
A/3666/2020 · ge (art. 2 let. a LPA)
Official Appeals Suspension of Departmental Duties
Cited in the reasoning concerning the admissibility of the appeal, specifically whether the contested act is a decision or an internal organizational act.
A/2252/2008 · ge (Art. 2 al. 3 LPA)
Appeal Inadmissibility Due to Untimely Filing and Lack of Force Majeure
This provision (although not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1 or 2, but rather used implicitly or as background context to support the finding of inadmissibility based on the opposition being invalid, which is a mandatory review by the court) does not appear explicitly in the dispositive orders.
UK080085 · zh (Art. 2 TSchG)
Appeal Against Dismissal of Animal Cruelty Investigation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the definition of animal mistreatment under the Animal Protection Act, which forms the basis of the underlying case.
VWBES.2006.319 · so (Art. 2 Tierschutzgesetz, TSchG, SR 455)
Dog Attack Measures Proportionality Review
General provision requiring that animals are kept and treated in a way that best meets their needs, forming the basis for the required measures.
A/2273/2005 · ge (Art. 2 let. e LPA)
Litigant v. Examination Board on Certification Exam Registration and Procedural Costs
Although cited in the reasoning to justify the applicability of the LPA, this provision was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.
A/2273/2005 · ge (Art. 2 let. e LPA)
Litigant v. Examination Board on Certification Exam Registration and Procedural Costs
This provision was cited in the reasoning regarding the applicability of the LPA, but not in the operative part.
A/2118/2005 · ge (Art. 2 lettre e LPA)
Student Suspends Fraud Finding Over Dictionary Use in Exam
Cited in the reasoning regarding procedural applicability, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders.