Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
451 NHGLPN CH

Art. 7 Loi fédérale du 1<sup>er</sup> juillet 1966 sur la protection de la nature et du paysage (LPN)

LPN; But; Chapitre 1 Protection de la nature, protection du paysage et conservation des monuments historiques dans l’accomplissement des tâches de la Confédération ; Expertise de la commission
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (69 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 7 LPN

Si l’accomplissement d’une tâche de la Confédération incombe à la Confédération, l’Office fédéral de l’environnement (OFEV), l’Office fédéral de la culture ou l’Office fédéral des routes, selon le domaine de compétence, détermine s’il est nécessaire qu’une expertise soit établie par la commission visée à l’art. 25, al. 1. Si le canton est compétent, c’est le service cantonal visé à l’art. 25, al. 2, qui détermine la nécessité d’une expertise.

Si l’accomplissement de la tâche de la Confédération peut altérer sensiblement un objet inscrit dans un inventaire fédéral en vertu de l’art. 5 ou soulève des questions de fond, la commission établit une expertise à l’intention de l’autorité de décision. Cette expertise indique si l’objet doit être conservé intact ou de quelle manière il doit être ménagé.

L’expertise constitue une des bases dont dispose l’autorité de décision pour procéder à la pesée de tous les intérêts en présence.

← Art. 6 LPN Loi fédérale du 1<sup>er</sup> juillet 1966 sur la protection de la nature et du paysage (LPN) Art. 8 LPN →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (64)

60/2008/48A · sh (Art. 7 NHG/Bund)
Municipality v. Cantonal Government: Cellular Facility Permit Dispute
Cited regarding the duty to consult expert commissions (ENHK or EKD) when there is a risk of significant impairment to a protected object.
60/2008/48A · sh (Art. 7 NHG/SH)
Municipality v. Cantonal Government: Cellular Facility Permit Dispute
Mentioned in relation to communal provisions on ensemble protection zones, but the federal standard (Art. 6 NHG/Bund) was deemed decisive for the national importance aspect.
VB.2003.00421 · zh (Art. 7 NHG)
Appeal Regarding Exception Permit for Joint Municipal Shooting Range Construction
This provision of the Nature and Heritage Protection Act was considered in the context of the project's impact on the landscape.
VB.2024.00496 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. II NHG)
Appeal Against Mobile Phone Antenna Permit Dismissed
The provision concerning the requirement for an expert opinion from the EKD/ENHK was addressed in the reasoning concluding that there was no significant impairment as per this article, leading to the rejection of the appeal.
VB.2024.00449 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 NHG)
Building Permit Appeal: Failure to Justify Agency Opinion in Protected Area
This provision was mentioned in the context of the involvement of the relevant cantonal authority, though the main issue was the failure to rule on the findings under Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG.
VB.2024.00449 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Building Permit Appeal: Failure to Justify Agency Opinion in Protected Area
The court found that the lower court failed to review the ARE's assessment regarding significant impairment or a fundamental question under this article.
BRGE.I.Nrn.0100.010 · zh (Art. 7 NHG)
Appeal Against Residential Complex Permit Design and Tree Preservation
This provision concerning the mandatory requirement to obtain an expert opinion from federal commissions if an object in a federal inventory is significantly affected was relevant to the ISOS objection, but the conditions for its application were not met.
WBE.2023.375.384 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Regional Government's Road Project Decision Partially Overturned Due to Noise, Traffic Safety, and Access to Information Concerns
Cited as the legal basis requiring consultation with the Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN) when a federal task could significantly impair a protected object.
VB.2024.00110 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 1 NHG)
Appeal Regarding Photovoltaic Permit Denial in Area of National Significance
This provision regarding the protection of nature and landscape is listed as a cited legal norm relevant to the case subject matter.
VB.2024.00110 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Appeal Regarding Photovoltaic Permit Denial in Area of National Significance
This provision regarding the protection of nature and landscape is listed as a cited legal norm relevant to the case subject matter.
WBE.2023.287 · ag (Art. 7 Abs. 2 NHG)
Judicial Review of Hydropower Plant Optimization Project Approval
The court discussed the requirement for expert opinions from the ENHK or EKD when federal inventory objects are significantly impacted, although it ultimately did not find a decisive procedural error in its absence for the 2015 decision.
VB.2023.00729 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. I NHG)
Building Permit for ISOS Property Upheld Despite Procedural Error
Cited for the violation concerning the federal agency's involvement in assessing whether an expert report from the Federal Office of Culture (ENHK) or the Federal Office of Civil Defence (EKD) was required.
VB.2023.00062 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. I NHG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Near Protected Area and Villa
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' cited in the context of the decision regarding heritage protection.
VB.2023.00062 · zh (Art. 7 Abs. II NHG)
Appeal Regarding Building Permit Near Protected Area and Villa
This provision is listed under 'Rechtsnormen' cited in the context of the decision regarding heritage protection.
VB.2024.00239 · zh (Art. 7 NHG)
Mobile Antenna Permit Appeal Remanded for Expert Assessment
Cited in the context of the required assessment by the FOT regarding the necessity of an expert opinion mentioned in the case background, which justified the remand.