272 ZPOCPC

CH

Art. 367 Code de procédure civile (CPC) - Récusation d’un arbitre

CPC; Partie 3 Arbitrage; Titre 4 Récusation, révocation et remplacement des arbitres

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (426 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 367 CPC · Récusation d’un arbitre

Un arbitre peut être récusé dans les cas suivants: a. faute des qualifications convenues entre les parties; b. en présence d’un motif de récusation prévu par le règlement d’arbitrage adopté par les parties; c. en cas de doutes légitimes sur son indépendance ou son impartialité.

Une partie ne peut récuser un arbitre qu’elle a désigné ou contribué à désigner que pour un motif dont, bien qu’ayant fait preuve de la diligence requise, elle n’a eu connaissance qu’après la nomination. Le motif de la récusation est communiqué sans délai au tribunal arbitral et à la partie adverse.

← Art. 366 CPC Code de procédure civile (CPC) - Objet Art. 368 CPC →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (14)

PG210004 · zh (Art. 367 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)

Arbitrator Disqualification Denied Due to Unavoidable "Duzen" with Counsel

Provides the basis for challenging an arbitrator if there are justified doubts about their independence or impartiality, which was the core issue of the application.

PG170002 · zh (Art. 367 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)

Challenge to Arbitral Secretariat Official Jurisdiction

Cited in the reasoning regarding grounds for challenging an arbitrator, but not in the dispositive.

PG110009 · zh (Art. 367 ZPO)

Arbitrator Disqualification Based on Prior Association with a Party

The court granted the motion to determine that the arbitrator could not be appointed due to bias/prior involvement, which is grounded in the grounds for challenge listed in this article.

ERZ 2011 18 · gr (Art. 367 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)

Arbitrator Disqualification and Replacement in Multi-Member Tribunal

The court explicitly found that the nominated arbitrator K. was rightfully rejected due to a lack of independence, applying this article.

ERZ 2011 18 · gr (Art. 367 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)

Arbitrator Disqualification and Replacement in Multi-Member Tribunal

The court explicitly found that the nominated arbitrator L. was rightfully rejected due to a lack of independence or impartiality, applying this article.

ERZ 2011 18 · gr (Art. 367 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)

Challenge to Arbitrator Appointment and Constitution of Tribunal

The court established that the proposed arbitrator L. was rightly rejected due to a lack of independence and impartiality based on this provision.

11.2008.143 · ti (art. 367 CPC)

Custody Modification Appeal Dismissed: Visitation Extension Upheld as Child's Best Interest

Cited in the reasoning to describe the summary nature of provisional measures.

CC.2006.62 · ne (Art. 367 CPC)

Spousal Support Duration and Amount Adjustment Based on Anticipated Workforce Re-entry

The court implicitly applied the rule for cost distribution in case of partial agreement in matrimonial proceedings when rejecting the appeal regarding costs.

11.1995.110 · ti (art. 367 CPC)

Heir's Appeal of Dismissal Based on Voidable Inheritance Waiver

Cited in the reasoning to explain why the lower court judge did not examine the validity of the waiver in the summary procedure.

11.2000.109 · ti (art. 367 CPC)

Estate Division Appeal: Procedural Defects in Distribution of Bank Accounts

Cited in the reasoning regarding restrictions on evidence collection in summary proceedings.

11.2007.132 · ti (art. 367 CPC)

Owner of Secondary Residence v. Adjacent Property Owner Regarding Parking Easement Encroachment

Cited to explain why the claim regarding the refusal of supplementary evidence was without merit in this type of procedure.

PKG 2011 15 · gr (Art. 367 Abs. 1 lit. c ZPO)

Arbitrator Challenges and Jurisdictional Review in Arbitration

Basis for upholding the rejection of arbitrator L due to justified doubts regarding independence and impartiality.

PG110009 · zh (Art. 367 ZPO)

Arbitrator Disqualification Due to Prior Consultation in Contract Dispute Arbitration

The court ruled in the dispositive to uphold the request to establish that the arbitrator could not be appointed due to bias/prior engagement, which falls under the grounds for challenge listed in Art. 367 ZPO.

HC.2025.265 · vd (Art. 367 CPC)

Arbitration Award Revision Denied: Lack of Arbitrator Domicile Insufficient Ground Absent Impartiality Doubt and Time-Barred

Cited in the context of discussing grounds for arbitrator disqualification, which underpins the applicant's unsuccessful argument for revision.