Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
155.21 VRPGLPJALGA CH-BE

Art. 61 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) - Décisions incidentes

Procédure de recours interne à l’administration - Objet du recours
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (140 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 61 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) · Décisions incidentes

1. Sont réputées décisions incidentes les décisions qui ne closent ni entièrement, ni partiellement la procédure, et qui portent en particulier sur

a la compétence,

b la récusation,

c la suspension de la procédure,

d l’obligation de renseigner, de témoigner ou de produire des pièces et l’exclusion d’une partie de l’audition des témoins,

e le refus d’autoriser la consultation du dossier,

f le refus d’admettre des preuves en péril,

g les mesures provisionnelles et les ordonnances relatives à l’effet suspensif.

2. Les décisions incidentes portant sur la compétence ou la récusation sont susceptibles de recours séparément. Ces décisions ne peuvent plus être attaquées ultérieurement.

3. Les autres décisions incidentes sont susceptibles de recours séparément

a si elles peuvent causer un préjudice irréparable, ou

b si l’admission du recours peut conduire immédiatement à une décision finale qui permet d’éviter une procédure probatoire longue et coûteuse.

4. Si le recours n’est pas recevable en vertu de l’alinéa 3 ou qu’il n’a pas été utilisé, les décisions incidentes peuvent être attaquées par un recours contre la décision finale dans la mesure où elles influent sur le contenu de celle-ci.

5. Les décisions attaquables doivent contenir l’indication des voies de droit.

← Art. 60 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) Dispositions générales - Champ d'application Art. 62 Loi sur la procédure et la juridiction administratives (LPJA) →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (153)

200 2024 714 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 3 lit. b VRPG)
Municipality v. Social Assistance Recipients Repayment Terms Appeal
Used to qualify the lower authority's decision as an appealable interim decision because allowing the appeal would immediately lead to a final decision, saving considerable effort.
200 2024 714 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Municipality v. Social Assistance Recipients Repayment Terms Appeal
Used to qualify the lower authority's decision as an interim decision.
100 2019 115 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Bernese Real Estate Tax Exemption Dispute Regarding Main Residence Requirements and Deferral Periods
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.1) to classify the deferral ruling as an interlocutory decision.
100 2019 115 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Bernese Real Estate Tax Exemption Dispute Regarding Main Residence Requirements and Deferral Periods
Cited in the reasoning (E. 5.2, 5.3) to establish that the interlocutory decision on the deferral period was appealable alongside the final decision.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 1 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 1.3) to define the nature of the decision as an interlocutory decision. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 2 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1, E. 2.5) regarding exceptions to the appealability of interlocutory decisions. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 3 Bst. a VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.6) regarding the conditions for appealing an interlocutory decision based on irremediable prejudice. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 3 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in the reasoning (E. 2.1, E. 2.5) regarding the conditions for appealing interlocutory decisions. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in reasoning (E. 2.3, E. 2.5) regarding the condition that an interlocutory decision affects the final ruling. Not in the dispositive.
100 2015 223 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 4 VRPG)
Admissibility of Appeal Against Interlocutory Cost Decision in Land Acquisition Permit Case
Cited in reasoning (E. 2.3) regarding the effect of the final decision on the interlocutory cost ruling. Not in the dispositive.
100 2025 263 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 3 Bst. a VRPG)
Appeal of Administrative Deadline Extension in Exam Review
This provision was discussed in the reasoning regarding the self-standing appealability of interlocutory decisions, though the court ultimately avoided a definitive ruling on its application to this case.
200 2024 419 · be (art. 61 let. fbis LPJA a contrario)
Worker's Appeal of Denied Impairment Indemnity Upheld Due to Insufficient Medical Evidence
Applied in order 2 to confirm that no procedural fees are to be collected because the procedure is free.
110 2025 24 · be (Art. 61 Abs. 1 Bst. a und Abs. 2 VRPG)
Building Permit Jurisdiction Dispute Over Hotel Terrace Modification
Cited in the reasoning to confirm the admissibility of the appeal against an interlocutory decision on jurisdiction.
100 2025 81 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 Abs. 1 Bst. b und Abs. 2 VRPG)
Municipality Appeal Regarding Official Disqualification for Building Permit Suggestion
Used to establish the court's jurisdiction as the final cantonal instance.
100 2024 322 · be (Art. 74 Abs. 3 i.V.m. Art. 61 VRPG)
Tax Appeals Commission Rulings on Intermediate Tax Assessment Clarification Not Immediately Appealable
This provision governs the conditions under which appeals against interlocutory decisions (which the court deemed the challenged decisions to be) are admissible.