851.1 SHGLAS

CH-AR

Art. 29 Loi sur l'aide sociale publique (Sozialhilfegesetz, SHG) - Introduction de la procédure

4. Section : Aide sociale individuelle - III. Procédure

Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (45 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 29 Loi sur l'assistance sociale, LAS · Introduction de la procédure

1. Une procédure de clarification des demandes d'aide sociale est initiée par la personne nécessiteuse elle-même ou par la commune. La connaissance d'une situation de détresse peut être obtenue sur la base de la requête d'une personne ou par d'autres moyens.

2. L'autorité compétente établit les faits conformément aux dispositions procédurales du canton.

← Art. 28 Loi sur l'aide sociale, LAS Loi sur l'aide sociale publique (Sozialhilfegesetz, SHG) Art. 30 Loi sur l'aide sociale, LAS →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (6)

VWBES.2020.74 · so (Art. 28, Art. 29 bis 34 ZUG)

Appeal Against Refusal of Subsidiary Cost Guarantee Lacking Current Interest

Cited in the reasoning as the relevant articles governing inter-cantonal procedures for social assistance disputes.

WBE.2016.346 · ag (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)

Social Assistance: Inter-Cantonal Jurisdiction and Cantonal Social Services' Responsibility

Cited as the basis for intercantonal communication occurring through competent cantonal authorities.

AGVE.2016.39 · ag (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)

Municipality Denied Authority Over Inter-Cantonal Social Assistance Responsibility

This provision states that communication between cantons regarding social assistance is handled by the competent cantonal official bodies, which was key to determining the correct procedure for the intercantonal jurisdiction conflict.

AGVE.2016.39 · ag (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)

Social Assistance: Canton Competence Dispute Resolution

Governs inter-cantonal communication through designated cantonal authorities and is cited in the context of clarifying responsibilities in negative competence conflicts.

B.2004.63 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)

Intercantonal Cost Responsibility for Institutional Care vs. Municipal Authority

The court affirmed the lower instance's finding that jurisdiction lies with cantonal authorities in inter-cantonal matters under the ZUG, as this provision regulates communication between cantons.

B.2004.63 · sg (Art. 29 Abs. 1 ZUG)

Intercantonal Cost-Sharing Dispute Between Municipalities Regarding Institutional Care

Cited in the reasoning to support the finding that intercantonal contact must occur via cantonal authorities, leading to the dismissal of the appeal based on procedural grounds regarding municipal authority.